Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:38:02.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First test, then judge future-oriented behaviour in animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2007

Elisabeth H. M. Sterck  and
Valérie Dufour
Elisabeth H. M. Sterck
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioural Biology, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The [email protected]://www.bio.uu.nl/behaviour/Sterck/index.html Ethology Research, Animal Science Department, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands;
Valérie Dufour
Affiliation:
Ethology Research, Animal Science Department, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands; Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, UMR 7178, Department Ecologie, Physiologie and Ethologie, CNRS, 67087 Strasbourg, Cedex 02, France. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Suddendorf & Corballis (S&C) argue that animals are not capable of mental time travel (MTT) or its components. However, new results on chimpanzees suggest that they plan for the future and possess some MTT components. Moreover, future-oriented behaviour and episodic-like memory in other animals suggest that not all animals are limited to the present. Animals' capacities should not be dismissed without testing them.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2007 , pp. 333 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, L., Henzi, P. & Dunbar, R. (2003) Primate cognition: From “what now?” to “what if?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(11):494–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, V. & Sterck, E. H. M. (submitted) Planning capacities in exchange and tool-use tasks in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).Google Scholar
Dufour, V., Pelé, M., Sterck, E. H. M. & Thierry, B. (2007) Chimpanzee anticipation of food return: Coping with waiting time in an exchange task. Journal of Comparative Psychology 121(2):145–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989) Delay of gratification in children. Science 244:933–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulcahy, N. J. & Call, J. (2006) Apes save tools for future use. Science 312:1038–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raby, C. R., Alexis, D. M., Dickinson, A. & Clayton, N. S. (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445(7130):919–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramseyer, A., Pelé, M., Dufour, V., Chauvin, C. & Thierry, B. (2006) Accepting loss: The temporal limits of reciprocity in brown capuchin monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273:179–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T. (2006) Foresight and evolution of the human mind. Science 312(5776):1006–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed