Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:22:31.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expecting phenomenology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2008

Maja Spener
Maja Spener
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4JJ, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Block's argument against correlationism depends in part on a view about what subjects in certain experiments can be aware of phenomenally. Block's main source of evidence for this view is introspection. I argue that introspection should not be trusted in this respect. This weakens Block's argument and undermines correlationism at the same time.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 5-6 , December 2007 , pp. 526 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chisholm, R. (1942) The problem of the speckled hen. Mind 51:368–73.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. & Pinkerton, R. J. (1973) On an argument against sensory items. Mind 82:269–72.Google Scholar
Landman, R., Spekreijse, H. & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003) Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research 43(2):149–64.Google Scholar
Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S. & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008) Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? Plos One 3(2):1–9.Google Scholar
Spener, M. (under review) Phenomenal adequacy and introspective evidence.Google Scholar
Sperling, G. (1960) The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 74(11, Whole No. 498):1–29. [Whole issue.]Google Scholar