No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2010
Jones introduces an intricate machinery of kin classification that overcomes limitations of previous accounts. I question whether such a machinery is plausible. Because individuals never need to learn the entire spectrum of kin terminology, they could rely on data-driven learning. The complexity of Jones's machinery for kin classification casts doubt on the existence of innate structures that cover the complete linguistic domain.
Target article
Does kinship terminology provide evidence for or against universal grammar?
Related commentaries (1)
Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar