Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-c4bhq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-11T07:25:37.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do intention and exploration modulate the pathways to haptic object identification?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2007

Roberta L. Klatzky  and
Susan J. Lederman
Roberta L. Klatzky
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213Canada. [email protected]://www.psy.cmu.edu/faculty/klatzky/
Susan J. Lederman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada. [email protected]://psyc.queensu.ca/faculty/lederman/lederman.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our model of haptic object recognition points to the importance of material, as well as geometric properties of objects. Collectively, these can elicit a recognition response after an initial contact, without sequential exploration. This model suggests a revision of the authors' proposals, which takes into account an individual's intention – whether it is for perception or action – and the extent of exploratory movement.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 213 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Klatzky, R. L. & Lederman, S. J. (1995) Identifying objects from a haptic glance. Perception and Psychophysics 57:1111–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatzky, R. L. & Lederman, S. J. (1999) The haptic glance: A route to rapid object identification and manipulation. In: Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application, ed. Gopher, D. & Koriat, A., pp.165–96. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lederman, S. J. & Klatzky, R. L. (1987) Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology 19:342–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederman, S. J. & Klatzky, R. L. (1990) Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration. Cognitive Psychology 22(4):421–59.Google Scholar
Loomis, J. M. & Lederman, S. J. (1986) Tactual perception. In: Handbook of perception and human performances, vol. 2: Cognitive processes and performance, ed. Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J. P., Ch. 31, pp. 31–1 to 31–41. Wiley.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M. & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8:382–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelano, C., Bensafi, M., Porter, J., Mainland, J., Johnson, B., Bremner, E., Telles, C., Khan, R. & Sobel, N. (2005) Attentional modulation in human primary olfactory cortex. Nature Neuroscience 8:114–20.Google Scholar