Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:49:20.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Directions and beliefs of self-presentational bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

David C. Funder
David C. Funder
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521. [email protected]://rap.ucr.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article tends to conflate self-deception and self-enhancement, but biased self-presentation can be negative as well as positive. Self-deceiving self-diminishers may be depressed and non-self-deceiving self-diminishers may project false modesty. The article's otherwise brilliant argument for the advantages of self-deceptive self-enhancement for deceiving others may underemphasize the risks it entails for poor decision making.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colvin, C. R., Block, J. & Funder, D. C. (1995) Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68:1152–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, O. P. & Robins, R. W. (1994) Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:206–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. (1988) Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin 103:193–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. (1994) Positive illusions and well being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin 116:21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed