Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:00:35.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences between the philosophy of mathematics and the psychology of number development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2008

Richard Cowan
Richard Cowan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Human Development, University of London, London WC1H 0AL, United [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The philosophy of mathematics may not be helpful to the psychology of number development because they differ in their purposes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , December 2008 , pp. 648
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, D. L. & Bass, H. (2003) Making mathematics reasonable in school. In: A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, ed. Kilpatrick, J., Martin, W. G. & Schifter, D., pp. 27–44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
Baroody, A. J. (1995) The role of the number-after rule in the invention of computational shortcuts. Cognition and Instruction 13:189–219.Google Scholar
Griffin, S. A., Case, R. & Siegler, R. S. (1994) Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. In: Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, ed. McGilly, K., pp. 25–49. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. & Koenig, M. A. (2006) Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development 77:505–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegler, R. S. & Robinson, M. (1982) The development of numerical understandings. In: Advances in child development and behaviour, vol. 16, ed. Reese, H. W. & Lipsitt, L. P., pp. 241–312. Academic Press.Google Scholar