Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-17T16:58:18.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Definitions and cultural dynamics in understanding “societies”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2025

Polly Wiessner Open the ORCID record for Polly Wiessner [Opens in a new window]
Polly Wiessner*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA and School of Human Evolution and Social Chnage, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA [email protected] https://search.asu.edu/profile/3034285
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Moffett's definition of societies and fascinating comparisons will help us understand some aspects of societies that apply across species, however, both definitions and the dynamics of deeply rooted cultural institutions that so transformed human communities will be critical to understanding “societies.”

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e75
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atran, S. (2016). The devoted actor: Unconditional commitment and intractable conflict across cultures. Current Anthropology, 57(S13), 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. (2007). The archaeological framework of the Upper Paleolithic revolution. Diogenes, 54(2), 3–18.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. S., Yellen, J. E., Potts, R., Behrensmeyer, A. K., Deino, A. L., Leslie, D. E, ... Whittaker, S. (2018). Long-distance stone transport and pigment use in the earliest Middle Stone Age. Science, 360(6384), 90–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapais, B. (2010). The deep structure of human society: Primate origins and evolution. In Kappeler, P. M. & Silk, J. B. (Eds.), Mind the gap: Tracing the origins of human universals (pp. 19–51). Springer.Google Scholar
Chapais, B. (2011). The deep social structure of humankind. Science, 331(6022), 1276–1277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
d'Errico, F., Henshilwood, C., Vanhaeren, M., & Van Niekerk, K. (2005). Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: Evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution, 48(1), 3–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, E. (1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. (1998). Palaeolithic society and the release from proximity: A network approach to intimate relations. World Archaeology, 29(3), 426–449.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. (1999). The Palaeolithic societies of Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegmon, M. (1992). Archaeological research on style. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21(1), 517–536.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (2003). The generative psychology of kinship: Part 1. Cognitive universals and evolutionary psychology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(5), 303–319.Google Scholar
Lee, R. B. (1986). !Kung Kinship, the name relationship and the process of discovery. Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Pearce, E., & Moutsiou, T. (2014). Using obsidian transfer distances to explore social network maintenance in late Pleistocene hunter–gatherers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 36, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodseth, L., Wrangham, R. W., Harrigan, A. M., Smuts, B. B., Dare, R., Fox, R., … Wolpoff, M. H. (1991). The human community as a primate society [and comments]. Current Anthropology, 32(3), 221–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijilmassi, A., Safra, L., & Baumard, N. (2024). “Our roots run deep”: Historical myths as culturally evolved technologies for coalitional recruitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Tylén, K., Fusaroli, R., Rojo, S., Heimann, K., Fay, N., Johannsen, N. N., … Lombard, M. (2020). The evolution of early symbolic behavior in Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4578–4584.Google ScholarPubMed
Vansina, J. M. (1985). Oral tradition as history. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Walker, R. S., Hill, K. R., Flinn, M. V., & Ellsworth, R. M. (2011). Evolutionary history of hunter-gatherer marriage practices. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e19066.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. (2021). The ritual animal: Imitation and cohesion in the evolution of social complexity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48(2), 253–276.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. (1986) !Kung San networks in a generational perspective. In Biesele, M., Gordon, R. & Lee, R. (Eds.), The past and future of !Kung ethnography (pp. 103–136). Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. W. (2014). Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(39), 14027–14035.Google ScholarPubMed
Wobst, H. M. (1977). Stylistic behavior and information exchange. For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, 61, 317–342.Google Scholar