Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:47:35.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confounding valence and arousal: What really underlies political orientation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Shona M. Tritt
Affiliation:
University of Toronto Scarborough, Department of Psychology, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, [email protected]@utoronto.cawww.michaelinzlicht.com
Michael Inzlicht
Affiliation:
University of Toronto Scarborough, Department of Psychology, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, [email protected]@utoronto.cawww.michaelinzlicht.com
Jordan B. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, [email protected]://jordanbpeterson.com/

Abstract

The negative valence model of political orientation proposed by Hibbing et al. is comprehensive and thought-provoking. We agree that there is compelling research linking threat to conservative political beliefs. However, we propose that further research is needed before it can be concluded that negative valence, rather than arousal more generally, underlies the psychological motivations to endorse conservative political belief.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Anan, Y., Wilson, T. D. & Gilbert, D. T. (2009) The feeling of uncertainty intensifies affective reactions. Emotion 9:123–27.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. & Vohs, K. D. (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5(4):323–70.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L. & Berntson, G. G. (1999) The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:839–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cararro, L., Castelli, L. & Macchiella, C. (2011) The automatic conservative: Ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information. PLoS ONE 6:e26456.Google Scholar
Cunningham, W.A. (2012) Motivational salience: Amygdala tuning from traits, needs, values, and goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21:5459.Google Scholar
Dodd, M. D., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C. M., Gruszczynski, M. W., Smith, K. B. & Hibbing, J. R. (2012) The political left rolls with the good; the political right confronts the bad. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 367(1589):640–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dombrink, J. (2006) Deepening reds, contrasting blues, and various purples. Contemporary Sociology 35:346–50.Google Scholar
Fodor, E. M., Wick, D. P., Hartsen, K. M. & Preve, R. M. (2008) Right-wing authoritarianism in relation to proposed judicial action, electromyographic response, and affective attitudes toward a schizophrenic mother. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38(1):215–33.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1982) The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, C. H. & Hansen, R. D. (1988) Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:917–24.Google Scholar
Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Xu, X. & Peterson, J. B. (2010) Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(5):655–64.Google Scholar
Hirsh, J. B. & Inzlicht, M. (2008) The devil you know: Neuroticism predicts neural response to uncertainty. Psychological Science 19:962–67.Google Scholar
Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C. & Rees, G. (2011) Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology 21:677–80.Google Scholar
Lodge, M. & Taber, C. S. (2013) The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, S. P., Garza, J. P., Wiebe, S. A., Dodd, M. D., Smith, K. B., Hibbing, J. R. & Espy, K. A. (in press) Applying the flanker task to political psychology. Political Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12056.Google Scholar
Monroe, K. R. (1979) Economic analyses of electoral behavior: A critical review. Political Behavior 1:137–73.Google Scholar
Murray, E. A. (2007) The amygdala, reward, and emotion. Trends in Cognitive Science 11:489–97.Google Scholar
Öhman, A. (1992) Orienting and attention: Preferred preattentive processing of potentially phobic stimuli. In: Attention and information processing in infants and adults. Perspectives from human and animal research, ed. Campbell, B. A., Haynes, H. & Richardson, R.. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., Hatemi, P. K. & Hibbing, J. R. (2008) Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science 321(5896):1667–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreiber, D. M., Fonzo, G., Simmons, A. N., Dawes, C. T., Flagan, T., Fowler, J. H. & Paulus, M. P. (2013) Red brain, blue brain: Evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PLoS ONE 8:e52970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R. & Hibbing, J. R. (2011) Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PloS ONE 6(10):19.Google Scholar
Smith, N., Cacioppo, J., Larsen, J. & Chartrand, T. (2003) May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia 41:171–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, P., Funk, C. & Craighill, P. (2006) Are we happy yet? Available at: http://pewresearch.org/assets/social/pdf/AreWeHappyYet.pdf.Google Scholar
Tritt, S. M., Peterson, J. B. & Inzlicht, M. (2013) Preliminary support for an arousal model of political conservatism. PLoS ONE 8:e83333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083333.Google Scholar
Weinberg, A. & Hajcak, G. (2010) Beyond good and evil: The time-course of neural activity elicited by specific picture content. Emotion 10:767–82.Google Scholar