Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:33:42.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confabulation, confidence, and introspection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Brian Fiala  and
Shaun Nichols
Brian Fiala
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. [email protected]@email.arizona.eduhttp://dingo.sbs.arizona.edu/~snichols/
Shaun Nichols
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. [email protected]@email.arizona.eduhttp://dingo.sbs.arizona.edu/~snichols/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carruthers' arguments depend on a tenuous interpretation of cases from the confabulation literature. Specifically, Carruthers maintains that cases of confabulation are “subjectively indistinguishable” from cases of alleged introspection. However, in typical cases of confabulation, the self-attributions are characterized by low confidence, in contrast to cases of alleged introspection.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 144 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hutton, R. & Sameth, J. (1988) The mind. Part 1: The search for the mind [Video]. Video film edited by Hutton, R.; directed by J. Sameth. Annenberg/CPB Project.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. & Wilson, T. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84:231–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, T. & Haidt, J. (2005) Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science 16:780–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed