No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Conceptual deficits without features: A view from atomism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 November 2001
Abstract
Humphreys and Forde fail to account for the ontology of the “features” that they claim are constitutive of concepts. This failure is common to decompositional theories of conceptual representation. Category-specific deficits can be better explained by a theory that takes inferential relations among atomic concepts to be the key characteristic of conceptual representation and processing.
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2001 Cambridge University Press