Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:20:50.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

But what if the default is defaulting?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2014

Ran R. Hassin
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, The Hebrew University, 91905 Jerusalem, Israel. [email protected]@mail.huji.ac.ilhttp://labconscious.huji.ac.ilpsychology.huji.ac.il/en/?cmd=Graduate.27&letter=m&act=read&id=60 The Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University, 91904 Jerusalem, Israel
Maxim Milyavsky
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, The Hebrew University, 91905 Jerusalem, Israel. [email protected]@mail.huji.ac.ilhttp://labconscious.huji.ac.ilpsychology.huji.ac.il/en/?cmd=Graduate.27&letter=m&act=read&id=60

Abstract

We critically consider the default view of consciousness and decision making, and we explore the implications of this view to the authors' argument. We therefore call for rigorous collection of data regarding the role of consciousness in decisions. We also propose that the section on subliminal effects significantly underestimates existing data and succinctly review relevant findings.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T. & Solomon, S. (1997) Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview. Psychological Science 8(5):379–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00429.x.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. (1974) Working memory. In: The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, ed. Bower, G. H., pp. 4789. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bermeitinger, C., Goelz, R., Johr, N., Neumann, M., Ecker, U. K. H. & Doerr, R. (2009) The hidden persuaders break into the tired brain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(2):320–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijleveld, E., Custers, R. & Aarts, H. (2009) The unconscious eye opener: Pupil dilation reveals strategic recruitment of resources upon presentation of subliminal reward cues. Psychological Science 20(11):1313–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02443.x.Google Scholar
Carter, T. J., Ferguson, M. J. & Hassin, R. R. (2011) A single exposure to the American flag shifts support toward Republicanism up to 8 months later. Psychological Science 22(8) 1011–18. doi: 10.1177/0956797611414726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, M. (2008) On becoming ready to pursue a goal you don't know you have: Effects of nonconscious goals on evaluative readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(6):1268–94. doi: 10.1037/a0013263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassin, R. R. (2013) Yes it can: On the functional abilities of the human unconscious. Perspectives in Psychological Science 8(2):195207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A. & Zimerman, S. (2009) Automatic and flexible: The case of non-conscious goal pursuit. Social cognition 27(1):2036. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2659887&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.Google Scholar
Hassin, R. R., & Sklar, A. Y (in press). On unconscious processes and President Obama. In: Dual process theories of the social mind. ed. Sherman, J. W., Gawrosnki, B. & Trope, Y.. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S. & Toth, J. P. (1992) Unconscious processes revealed: Attention, awareness, and control. American Psychologist 47:802809.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1973) Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W. & Claus, J. (2006) Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42(6):792–98.Google Scholar
Kiesel, A., Wagener, A., Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., Fallgatter, A. J. & Stöcker, C. (2006) Unconscious manipulation of free choice in humans. Consciousness and Cognition 15(2):397408. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.10.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klapp, S. T. & Haas, B. W. (2005) Nonconscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus–response associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31(1):193209. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.193.Google ScholarPubMed
Kouider, S. & Dehaene, S. (2007) Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362(1481):857–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, H. C. & Passingham, R. E. (2007) Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27(21):5805–11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4335-06.2007.Google Scholar
Loersch, C., McCaslin, M. J. & Petty, R. E. (2011) Exploring the impact of social judgeability concerns on the interplay of associative and deliberative attitude processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(5):1029–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milyavsky, M., Hassin, R. R. & Schul, Y. (2012) Guess what? Implicit motivation boosts the influence of subliminal information on choice. Consciousness and Cognition 21(3):1232–41. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.001.Google Scholar
Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T. & Zajonc, R. B. (2000) Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science 11(6):462–66.Google Scholar
Mudrik, L., Breska, A., Lamy, D. & Deouell, L. Y. (2011) Integration without awareness. Psychological Science 22(6):764–70. doi: 10.1177/0956797611408736.Google Scholar
Mussweiler, T. & Englich, B. (2005) Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 98(2):133–43. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.12.002.Google Scholar
Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K. & Epstude, K. (2004) The man who wasn't there: Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40(5):689–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.01.004.Google Scholar
Opstal, F. Van, Lange, F. de & Dehaene, S. (2011) Rapid parallel semantic processing of numbers without awareness. Cognition 120:136–47. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027711001053.Google Scholar
Raio, C. M., Carmel, D., Carrasco, M. & Phelps, E. A. (2012) Nonconscious fear is quickly acquired but swiftly forgotten. Current Biology: CB 22(12):R477–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.023.Google Scholar
Schlaghecken, F. & Eimer, M. (2004) Masked prime stimuli can bias “free” choices between response alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(3):463–68. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15376796.Google Scholar
Sklar, A., Levy, N., Goldstein, A., Mandel, R., Maril, A. & Hassin, R. R. (2012) Reading and doing arithmetic nonconsciously. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109(48):19614–19. Retrieved from www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1211645109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211645109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J. & Zanna, M. P. (2002) Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38(6):556–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bussche, E., Van den Noortgate, W., Reynvoet, B., Bussche, E. Van Den & Noortgate, W. Van Den. (2009) Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 135(3):452–77. doi: 10.1037/a0015329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S. & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008) Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control. Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 28(32):8053–62. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1278-08.2008.Google Scholar
Veltkamp, M., Custers, R. & Aarts, H. (2011) Motivating consumer behavior by subliminal conditioning in the absence of basic needs: Striking even while the iron is cold. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21(1):4956. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.09.011.Google Scholar
Verwijmeren, T., Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W. & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2011) The workings and limits of subliminal advertising: The role of habits. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21(2):206–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.11.004.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D. & Brekke, N. (1994) Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological bulletin 116(1):117–42. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8078969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed