Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:35:48.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attachment theories maltreated?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Susan Mineka  and
Douglas Rush
Susan Mineka
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisc. 53706
Douglas Rush
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisc. 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 453 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amsel, A. Partial reinforcement effects on vigor and persistence. In: Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T. (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Brown, R. T. & Wagner, A. R.Resistance to punishment and extinction following training with shock or nonreinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 68:503–507, 1964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinde, R. A.Biological bases of human social behaviour. McGraw-Hill, New York and London, 1974.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. L. Opponent-processes and acquired motivation. EPA Distinguished Lecture, April 1, 1978.Google Scholar