Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:22:34.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Associative learning requires associations, not propositions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Frank Baeyens ,
Debora Vansteenwegen  and
Dirk Hermans
Frank Baeyens
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. [email protected]@[email protected]://ppw.kuleuven.be/ppw/index.htmhttp://ppw.kuleuven.be/ppw/english/http://ppw.kuleuven.be/leerpsy/
Debora Vansteenwegen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. [email protected]@[email protected]://ppw.kuleuven.be/ppw/index.htmhttp://ppw.kuleuven.be/ppw/english/http://ppw.kuleuven.be/leerpsy/
Dirk Hermans
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. [email protected]@[email protected]://ppw.kuleuven.be/ppw/index.htmhttp://ppw.kuleuven.be/ppw/english/http://ppw.kuleuven.be/leerpsy/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We discuss findings on evaluative conditioning (EC) that are problematic for the “conscious reasoning/propositional knowledge” account of learning, namely, dissociations between conscious beliefs and acquired (dis)liking. We next argue that, both for EC and for Pavlovian learning in general, conditioned responding cannot rationally be inferred from propositional knowledge type “CS refers to/signals US,” and that, therefore, performance cannot be explained.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 198 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baeyens, F., Crombez, G., De Houwer, J. & Eelen, P. (1996a) No evidence for modulation of evaluative flavor-flavor associations in humans. Learning and Motivation 27:200–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Crombez, G. & De Houwer, J. (2001a) On the role of beliefs in observational flavor conditioning. Current Psychology 20:183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Van den Bergh, O. & Crombez, G. (1990b) Flavor-flavor and color-flavor conditioning in humans. Learning and Motivation 21:434–55.Google Scholar
Baeyens, F., Hendrickx, H., Crombez, G. & Hermans, D. (1998) Neither extended sequential nor simultaneous feature positive training result in modulation of evaluative flavor conditioning in humans. Appetite 31:185–204.Google Scholar
Baeyens, F., Vansteenwegen, D., De Houwer, J. & Crombez, G. (1996b) Observational conditioning of food valence in humans. Appetite 27:235–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baeyens, F., Vansteenwegen, D., Hermans, D. & Eelen, P. (2001b) Chilled white wine, when all of a sudden the doorbell rings: Mere reference and evaluation versus expectancy and preparation in human Pavlovian learning. In: Advances in psychology research, vol. 4, ed. Columbus, F., pp. 241–77. Nova Science.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. R. & Dickinson, A. (1990) Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A comment on Baeyens, Eelen, and Van den Bergh. Cognition and Emotion 4:19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vansteenwegen, D., Francken, G., Vervliet, B., De Clercq, A. & Eelen, P. (2006) Resistance to extinction in evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 32:71–79.Google ScholarPubMed