Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:57:59.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Another way to learn about teaching: What dogs can tell us about the evolution of pedagogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Angie M. Johnston ,
Katherine McAuliffe  and
Laurie R. Santos
Angie M. Johnston
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. [email protected]@[email protected]://pantheon.yale.edu/~aj329/https://yale.academia.edu/KatherineMcauliffehttp://psychology.yale.edu/faculty/laurie-r-santos
Katherine McAuliffe
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. [email protected]@[email protected]://pantheon.yale.edu/~aj329/https://yale.academia.edu/KatherineMcauliffehttp://psychology.yale.edu/faculty/laurie-r-santos
Laurie R. Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511. [email protected]@[email protected]://pantheon.yale.edu/~aj329/https://yale.academia.edu/KatherineMcauliffehttp://psychology.yale.edu/faculty/laurie-r-santos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kline argues that it is crucial to isolate the respective roles of teaching and learning in order to understand how pedagogy has evolved. We argue that doing so requires testing species that learn from pedagogy but that rarely teach themselves. Here, we review how one previously neglected species – domesticated dogs (Canis familiaris) – may allow researchers to do just that.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N., Spelke, E. & Schulz, L. (2011) The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition 120(3):322–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2011) Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366(1567):1149–57. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0319.Google Scholar
Hare, B. (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Science 9(9):439–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaswal, V. K., Croft, A. C., Setia, A. R. & Cole, C. A. (2010) Young children have a specific, highly robust bias to trust testimony. Psychological Science 21(10):1541–47. doi: 10.1177/0956797610383438.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G. & Keil, F. C. (2007) The hidden structure of overimitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104(50):19751–56. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704452104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miklósi, Á., Polgárdi, R., Topál, J. & Csányi, V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Animal Cognition 1(2):113–21. doi: 10.1007/s100710050016.Google Scholar
Skerry, A. E., Lambert, E., Powell, L. J. & McAuliffe, K. (2013) The origins of pedagogy: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Evolutionary Psychology 11(3):500–72.Google Scholar
Topál, J., Gergely, G., Erdőhegyi, Á., Csibra, G. & Miklósi, Á. (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 325(5945):1269–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1176960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Topál, J., Kis, A. & Oláh, K. (2014) Dogs' sensitivity to human ostensive cues: A unique adaptation? In: The social dog: Behaviour and cognition, ed. Kaminski, J. & Marshall-Pescini, S.. Elsevier.Google Scholar