Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T22:15:25.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyses of mating differences within-sex and between-sex are complementary, not competing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Todd K. Shackelford ,
Gregory J. LeBlanc ,
Richard L. Michalski  and
Viviana A. Weekes
Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Division of Science-Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 {tshackel; gleb2044; rmic5640; vwee9812}@fau.edu
Gregory J. LeBlanc
Affiliation:
Division of Science-Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 {tshackel; gleb2044; rmic5640; vwee9812}@fau.edu
Richard L. Michalski
Affiliation:
Division of Science-Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 {tshackel; gleb2044; rmic5640; vwee9812}@fau.edu
Viviana A. Weekes
Affiliation:
Division of Science-Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 {tshackel; gleb2044; rmic5640; vwee9812}@fau.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analyses of between-sex differences have provided a powerful starting point for evolutionarily informed work on human sexuality. This early work set the stage for an evolutionary analysis of within-sex differences in human sexuality. A comprehensive theory of human sexual strategies must address both between-sex differences and within-sex differences in evolved psychology and manifest behavior.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2000 , pp. 621
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable