Adams, J. A. Issues for a closed-loop theory of motor learning. In: Stelmach, G. E. (ed.), Motor Control: Issues and Trends. Academic Press, New York, pp. 87–108, 1976. [JK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. R.Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review. 85: 249–277, 1978. [LH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anstis, S. M.Size adaptation to visual texture and print: evidence for spatial-frequency analysis. American Journal of Psychology. 87: 261–267. 1974. [MS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Appelbaum, M. L., Clifton, G. L., Coggeshall, R. E., Coulter, J. D., Vance, W. H., & Willis, W. D.Unmyelinated fibres in the sacral 3 and caudual 1 ventral roots of the cat. Journal of Physiology (London). 256: 557–572, 1976. [KM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, M., Singer, G., & Wallace, M.Three processes which occur during adaptation to transformation of the visual field. Perception. 3: 439–450, 1974. [GS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ayres, A. J.Sensory Integration and Learning Disorders. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, 1972. [DF]Google Scholar

Bakan, P. & Weiler, E.Kinesthetic aftereffects and mode of exposure to the inspection stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 65: 319–320, 1963. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrens, F. & Grüsser, O.-J. Movement perception and eye movements elicited by stationary visual patterns illuminated by intermittent flashes. In: Kommerell, -G. (ed.), Disorders of Ocular Motility. Bergmann, Munich, pp. 273–283, 1978. [VH]Google Scholar

Bentley, A. F.Inquiry into Inquiries. Beacon, Boston, 1954. [MT]Google Scholar

Bernstein, N.The Coordination and Regulation of Movement. Pergamon, New York, 1967. [JK]Google Scholar

Bower, T. G. R.Development in Infancy. Freeman, San Francisco, 1974. [WS]Google Scholar

Bridgeman, B., Hendry, D., & Stark, L.Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements. Vision Research. 15: 719–722, 1975. [AM, BB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bridgeman, B. & Lewis, S. J.How the eye knows where the world is. Neuroscience Abstracts. 2: 394, 1976. [BB]Google Scholar

Brown, J. F.The visual perception of velocity. Psychologische Forschung. 14: 199–232, 1931. [AM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buettner, U. W., Büttner, U., & Henn, V.Vestibular nuclei activity during suppression of optokinetic nystagmus in the monkey. Pflügers Archiv Physiological Supplement. 377:R 51, 1978. [VH]Google Scholar

Caelli, T. M.Psychophysical interpretations and experimental evidence for the LTG/NP theory of perception. Cahiers de Psychologic. 20(no. 2/3): 107–134, 1977. [JG]Google Scholar

Campbell, F. W. The transmission of spatial information through the visual system. In: Schmitt, F. O. & Worden, F. G. (eds.), The Neurosciences: Third Study Program, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1974. [MS]Google Scholar

Canon, L. K.Intermodality inconsistency of inputs and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 84: 141–147, 1970. [JK, GR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cegalis, John A.Prism distortion and accommodative change. Perception and Psychophysics. 13: 494–498, 1973. [DF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cegalis, John A. & Young, R.Effect of inversion-induced conflict on field dependence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 83: 373–379, 1974. [DF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, W. C. “Pain report (LX) is not pain sensation (d): They may be related.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., Sept. 1976. [DF]Google Scholar

Clifton, G. L., Coggeshall, R. E., Vance, W. H., & Willis, W. D.Receptive fields of unmyelinated ventral root afferent fibres in the cat. Journal of Physiology (London). 256: 573–600, 1976. [KM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coggeshall, R. E., Appelbaum, M. L., Frazen, M., Stubbs, T. B., & Sykes, M. T.Unmyelinated axons in human ventral roots, a possible explanation for the failure of dorsal rhyzotomy to relieve pain. Brain Research. 98: 157–166, 1975. [KM]Google Scholar

Cohen, M. M. “Curvature after-effects following exposure under prismatic viewing conditions.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1965. [MS]Google Scholar

Collins, C. C. The human oculomotor control system. In: Pennerstrand, G. and Back-Y-Rita, P. (eds.), Basic Mechanisms of Ocular Motility and Their Clinical Implications. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975. [WS]Google Scholar

Collins, J. K.Isolation of a muscular component in a proprioceptive spatial aftereffect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 90: 297–299, 1971 [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, J. K. & Lahy, P.The effect of muscular involvement in a kinesthetic spatial aftereffect. Australian Journal of Psychology. 24: 75–81, 1972. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, J. K. & Lord, J.A muscular component in the inter-limb transfer of the kinesthetic spatial aftereffect. Australian Journal of Psychology. 23: 185–188, 1971. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coquery, J. M. Role of active movement in control of afferent input from skin in cat and man. In: G. Gordon (ed.) Active Touch. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1978. [KM]Google Scholar

Coulter, J. D.Sensory transmissions through lemniscal pathway during voluntary movement in the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology. 37: 831–845, 1974. [KM, JK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Craske, B.Adaptation to prisms: change in internally registered eyeposition. British Journal of Psychology. 58: 329–335, 1967. [BC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. F.Knowing and the Known. Beacon, Boston, 1949. [MT]Google Scholar

Dyhre-Poulsen, P.Increased vibration threshold before movements in human subjects. Experimental Neurology. 47: 516–522, 1975. [JK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perception of tactile stimuli before ballistic and during tracking movements. In: Gordon, G. (ed.), Active Touch. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1978. [KM]Google Scholar

Easton, T.On the normal use of reflexes. American Scientist. 60: 591–599, 1972. [JK, DF]Google ScholarPubMed

Ebenholtz, S. M.The possible role of eye-muscle potentiation in several forms of prism adaptation. Perception. 3: 477–485, 1974. [SE, WS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Additivity of aftereffects of maintained head and eye rotations: an alternative to recalibration. Perception & Psychophysics. 19(1):113–116, 1976. [KP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The constancies in object orientation: an algorithm processing approach. In: Epstein, W. (ed.), Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception: Mechanisms and Processes. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1977. [SE, RH]Google Scholar

Aftereffects of sustained vertical divergence: induced vertical phoria and illusory target height. Perception. 7:305–314, 1978. [SE, WS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebenholtz, S. M. & Benzschawel, T. L.The rod and frame effect and induce head tilt as a function of observation distance. Perception & Psychophysics. 22(5):491–496, 1977. [KP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebenholtz, S. M. & Paap, K. R.Further evidence for an orientation constancy based upon-registration of ocular position. Psychological Research. 38: 395–409, 1976. [KP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ebenholtz, S. M. & Wolfson, D. M.Percpetual aftereffects of sustained convergence. Perception & Psychophysics. 77: 485–491, 1975. [SE]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efstathiou, A. “Correlated and De-Correlated Visual Feedback in Modifying Eye-Hand Coordination.” Paper read at Eastern Psychological Association 1963. [BP]Google Scholar

Epstein, W.Recalibration by pairing: a process of perceptual learning. Perception. 4: 59–72, 1975. [KP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Evarts, E. V.Feedback and corollary discharge: a merge of concepts. Neuroscience Research Program Bulletin 6: 86–112, 1972. [PR]Google Scholar

Brain mechanisms in movement. Scientific American. 229:(1) 96–103, 1973. [DF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitch, H. & Turvey, M. T. On the control of activity: some remarks from an ecological point of view. In: Landers, D. M. & Christina, R. W. (eds.), Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, Ill., 1978. [MT]Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A.Timing Control in Speech Production. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Ind., 1977. [JK]Google Scholar

Freides, D.Human information processing and sensory modality: crossmodal functions, information complexity, memory and deficit. Psychological Bulletin. 81: 284–310, 1974. [DF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Do dichotic listening procedures measure lateralization of information processing or retrieval strategy? Perception & Psychophysics. 21:259–263, 1977. [DF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganz, L. Orientation in visual space by neonates and its modification by visual deprivation. In: Riesen, A. H. (ed.), The Developmental Neuropsychology of Sensory Deprivation. Academic Press, New York, 1975. [RBW]Google Scholar

Ghez, C. & Lenzi, G. L.Modulation of sensory transmission in cat lemniscal system during voluntary movement. Pflugers Archive fur die Gesamte Physiologie die Menschen. 323: 272–278, 1971. [KM, JK]Google ScholarPubMed

Ghez, C. & Pisa, M.Inhibition of afferent transmission in cuneate nucleus during voluntary movement in the cat. Brain Research. 40: 145–151, 1972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibson, J. J.The Perception of the Visual World. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1950. [WS]Google Scholar

The useful dimensions of sensitivity. American Psychologist. 18:1–16, 1963. [JG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

An Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, in press. [MT]Google Scholar

Ecological optics. Vision Research. 1: 253–262, 1961. [MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, J. J. & Radner, M.Adaptation after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 20: 453–467, 1937. [RD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granit, R.Receptors and Sensory Perception. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955a. [KM]Google Scholar

Centrifugal and antidromic effects on ganglion cells of retina. Journal of Neurophysiology. 19:388–411, 1955b. [KM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granit, R. & Kaada, B. R.Influence of stimulation of central nervous structures on muscle spindles in cat. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 27: 130–160, 1952. [KM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, D. M. & Birdsall, T. G.Detection and recognition. Psychological Review. 85: 192–206, 1978. [LH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, P. H. Problems of organization of motor systems. In: Rosen, R. & Snell, F. (eds.), Progress in Theoretical Biology. Vol. 2., Academic Press, New York, 1972. [JK]Google Scholar

Gregory, R. L.Eye and Brain. McGraw Hill, New York, 1966. [RH]Google Scholar

Grillner, S.Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiological Reviews. 55: 247–304, 1975. [JK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gruzelier, J. H. & Venables, P. H.Skin conductance responses to tones with and without attentional significance in schizophrenic and non-schizophrenic psychiatric patients. Neuropsychologia. 11: 221–230, 1973. [DF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haber, R. N. Visual perception. In: Rosensweig, M. R. (ed.), Annual Review of Psychology. Annual Review Press, Palo Alto, pp. 31–59, 1978. [RH]Google Scholar

Hansen, R. M. & Skavenski, A. A.Accuracy of eye position information for motor control. Vision Research. 17: 919–926, 1977. [JL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

The brain closely monitors the position of the pursuing eye. Investigative Ophthalmology. ARVO Abstracts, p. 139. 1978. [JL]Google Scholar

Harris, C. S.Adaptation to displaced vision: visual, motor or proprioceptive change? Science. 140: 812–813, 1963. [JH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beware of the straight-ahead shift: a non-perceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision. Perception. 3:461–476, 1974. [JL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hay, J. C. & Goldsmith, W. M.Space-time adapatations of visual position constancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 99(1):1–9, 1973. [IK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hebb, D. O.Organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York, 1949 [AR]Google Scholar

Hein, A. & Held, R.Dissociation of the visual placing response into elicited and guided components. Science. 158: 390–392, 1967. [MJ]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hein, A., Held, R., & Gower, E. C.Development and segmentation of visually controlled movement by selective exposure during rearing. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 73: 181–187, 1970. [RBW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Held, R.Adaptation to rearrangement and visual-spatial aftereffects. Psycho-logische Beitrage. 6: 439–450, 1962. [RD]Google Scholar

Held, R.Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American. 213: 84–94, 1965. [CB, BC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dissociation of visual functions by deprivation and rearrangement. Psycho logische Forschung. 31:338–348, 1968. [BB, AM, HM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Two modes of processing spatially distributed visual stimulation. In: Schmitt, F. P. (ed.), The Neurosciences: Second Study Program. Rockefeller University Press, New York, 1970. [HM]Google Scholar

Held, R. & Bauer, J. A. Jr., Visually-guided reaching in infant monkeys after restricted rearing. Science. 155: 718–720, 1967. [RDN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Held, R. & Bosson, J.Neonatal deprivation and adult rearrangement: complementary techniques for analyzing plastic sensory motor coordinations. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 54: 33–37, 1961. [HM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Held, R. & Hein, A. On the modifiability of form perception. In: Wathen-Dunn, Weiant (ed.), Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1967. [HM]Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H.Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. 1st Ed., Leipzig, Voss, 1867. [PR]Google Scholar

Higgins, J. R. & Angel, R. W.Correction of tracking errors without sensory feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 84: 412–416, 1970. [JK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hochberg, J.On the importance of movement-produced stimulation in prism-induced after-effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 16: 544, 1963. [JH, RD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, W. C.The Lie algebra of visual perception. Journal of Mathemati-cial Psychology. 3: 65–98, 1966. [JG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, I. P. The adaptability of the visual-motor system. In: K. J. Connolly (ed.) Mechanisms of Motor Skills Development. Academic Press, London, 1970. [JG]Google Scholar

Howard, I. P.Perceptual learning and adaptation. British Medical Bulletin. 27: 248–252, 1971. [JG]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hubel, D. M., and Wiesel, T. N.Receptive fields and functional architecture in two striate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. Journal of Neurophysi-ology. 28: 229–289, 1965 [JG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingle, D.Two visual mechanisms underlying the behavior of fish, Psycholog-ische Forschung. 31: 44–51, 1967. [HM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ittelson, W. H.Visual Space Perception. Springer Publishing Co., New York, 1960. [MJ]Google Scholar

Johnston, I. R., White, G. R., & Cumming, R. W.The role of optical expansion patterns in locomotor control. American Journal of Psychology. 86: 311–324, 1937. [RD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, L.Sight and Mind: An Introduction to Visual Perception. Oxford University Press, New York, 1974. [GR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelso, J. A. S.Planning and efferent components in the coding of movement. Journal of Motor Behavior. 9: 33–47, 1977. [JK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, E., Olson, M. E., & Epstein, W.Allocation of attention and the locus of adaptation to displaced vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1: 237–245, 1975. [GR, JK]Google Scholar

Kintsch, W.The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1974. [LH]Google Scholar

Kohler, I.The formation and transformation of the perceptual world. Psychological Issues Monographs. 3: 12, 1964. [HM]Google Scholar

Kohler, I.The formation and transformation of the visual world. Psychological Issues. 3(No. 4), 1964. [JG]Google Scholar

Kornheiser, A. S.Adaptation to laterally displaced vision: A review. Psychological Bulletin. 83: 783–815, 1976. [JK, MT, RW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kostyuk, P. G. & Vasilenko, D. A.Transformation of cortical motor signals in spinal cord. Proceedings of the IEEE. 56: 1049–1058, 1968. [JK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kots, Ya. M.The Organization of Voluntary Movement. Plemim, New York, 1977. [JK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krantz, D. H.Threshold theories of signal detection. Psychological Review. 76: 308–324, 1969. [LH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krueger, L. E.A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review. 85: 278–304, 1978. [LH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lackner, J. R.Adaptation to visual and proprioceptive rearrangement: origin of the differential effectiveness of active and passive movements. Perception and Psychophysics. 21: 55–59, 1977. [RH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, D. N. Visual information during locomotion. In: Macheod, R. B. and Pick, H. L. (eds.), Perception: Essays in Honor of J. J. Gibson. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1974. [RH, AM, MT]Google Scholar

A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception. 5:437–459, 1976. [MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The functions of vision, In: Pick, H. and Saltzman, E. (eds.), Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1978. [JK, MT]Google Scholar

Lee, D. N. & Aaronson, E.Visual proprioceptive standing in human infants. Perception and Psychophysics. 15: 529–532, 1974. [MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, D. N. & Lishman, J. R.Visual proprioceptive control of stance. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 1: 87–95, 1975. [MT]Google Scholar

Lindsay, P. H. & Norman, D. A.Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology (2nd Ed.). Academic Press, New York, 1977. [LH]Google Scholar

Lishman, J. R. & Lee, D. N.The autonomy of visual kinaesthesis. Perception. 2: 287–295, 1973. [MT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lotze, R. H.Medicinische Psychologie, oder Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig, 1852. Bk. II, chap. 4, sect. 28, paras. 289, 290, 292–294 translated by-D. Cantor, are presented In: Herrnstein, R. J. and Boring, E. G. (eds.), A Source Book in the History of Psychology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1965. [JH]Google Scholar

Mace, W. M. James J. Gibson's strategy for perceiving: Ask not what's inside your head, but what your head's inside of. In: Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977. [JL]Google Scholar

Mace, W. M. and Pittenger, J. B.Directly perceiving Gibson: a further reply to Gyr. Psychological Bulletin. 82: 137–139, 1975. [JG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mack, A.An investigation of the relationship between eye and retinal image movement in the perception of movement. Perception and Psychophysics. 8: 291–298, 1970. [AM, HW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Two modes of visual perception. In: Pick, H. (ed.), Modes of Perception. Laurence Erlbaum, New York, 1978. [AM]Google Scholar

Mack, A. & Bachant, J.Perceived movement of the after-image during eye movement. Perception and Psychophysics. 6: 379–384, 1969. [AM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mack, A. & Herman, E.The loss of position constancy during pursuit eye movements. Vision Research. 18: 55–62, 1978. [AM, HW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mack, A. & Rock, I.A re-examination of the Stratton effect: Egocentric adaptation to a rotated visual image. Perception and Psychophysics. 4: 57–62, 1968. [AM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mather, J. & Lackner, J.Adaptation to visual rearrangement elicited by tonic vibration reflexes. Experimental Brain Research. 24: 103–105, 1975. [JK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matin, E.Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 81: 899–917, 1974. [LH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matin, L. Eye movements and perceived visual direction. In: Jameson, D. and Hurvich, L. M. (eds.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. VII/4, Visual Psychophysics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1972. [JL]Google Scholar

A possible hybrid mechanism for modification of visual direction associated with eye movements - the paralyzed-eye experiments reconsidered. Perception. 5:233–239, 1976a. [WS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saccades and extra retinal signals for visual direction. In: Monty, R. A. and Senders, J. W. (eds.), Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 205–220, 1976b. [RH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matin, E., & Pearce, D. G.Eye movements in the dark during the attempt to maintain a prior fixation position. Vision Research. 10: 837–847, 1970. [WS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McLaughlin, S. C., Rifkin, K. I., & Webster, R. G.Oculomotor adaptation to wedge prisms with no part of the body seen. Perception & Psychophysics. 1: 452–458, 1966. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, S. C. & Webster, R. G.Changes in straight-ahead eye position during adaptation to wedge prisms. Perception & Psychophysics. 2: 37–44, 1967. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melamed, L. E., Halay, M., & Gildow, J. W.Effect of external target presence on visual adaptation with active and passive movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 98: 125–130, 1973. [JK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melvill-Jones, G. The vestibular system for eye movement control. In: Monty, R. A. and Senders, J. W. (eds.), Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 3–18, 1976. [RH]Google Scholar

Plasticity in the adult vestibulo-ocular reflex arc. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B. 278:319–334, 1977. [VH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikaelian, H. & Held, R.Two types os adaptation to an optically-rotated visual field. American Journal of Psychology. 77: 257–263, 1964. [RD, SE, HM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Two types of adaptation to an optically-rotated visual field as a function of degree of optical tilt and exposure time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72:629–634, 1966. [AM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, J. & Festinger, L.Impact of oculomotor retaining on the visual perception of curvature. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 3(2):187–200, 1977 [JH, JL, JM, KP, IR]Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. & Walk, R. D. “Self-Produced Movement is Unnecessary for the Development of Visually Guided Depth Discrimination. Paper presented at meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, April 1975. [RDW]Google Scholar

Minsky, M. & Papert, S.Perceptrons. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1969. [LH]Google Scholar

Moylan, J. J.Kinesthetic figural aftereffects: satiation of contrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 67: 83–90, 1964. [GS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Neisser, U.Cognitive Psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1967. [LH]Google Scholar

Ogle, K. N. The optical space sense. In: Davson, H. (ed.), The Eye. Vol. 4. Academic Press, New York, pp. 211–418, 1962. [RH]Google Scholar

Paap, K. R. & Ebenholtz, S. M.Perceptual consequences of potentiation in the extraocular muscles: an alternative explanation for adaptation to wedge prisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2: 457–468, 1976. [SE, KP, WS]Google ScholarPubMed

Concomitant direction and distance after effects of sustained covergence: A muscle potentiation explanation for eye-specific adaptation. Perception and Psychophysics. 21:307–314, 1977. [SE, KP, WS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pew, R. W. Human perceptual-motor performance. In: Kantowitz, B. H. (ed.), Human Information Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, 1974. [JK]Google Scholar

Pick, H. L. & Hay, J. C.Adaptation to prismatic distortion. Psychonomic Science. 1: 199–200, 1964. [RD, IR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A passive test of the Held reafference hypothesis. Perceptual Motor Skills. 20:1070–1072, 1965. [BC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pittenger, J. & Shaw, R.Aging faces as visual-elastic events: implications for a theory of non-rigid shape perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1: 374–382, 1975. [MT]Google Scholar

Poincaré, H.Science and Hypothesis. Dover, New York, 1952. [JG]Google Scholar

Poincaré, H.The Value of Science. Dover, New York, 1958. [JG]Google Scholar

Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M.Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review. 83: 157–171, 1976. [JK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Posner, M. I. & Snyder, C. R. R. Attention and cognitive control. In: Solso, R. L. (ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1975. [GR]Google Scholar

Powers, W. T.Behavior: The Control of Perception. Aldine, Chicago, 1973. [LH]Google Scholar

Prescott, J. W. Early somatosensory deprivation as an ontogenetic process in the abnormal development of brain and behavior. In: Goldsmith, E. I. & Moor-Jankowski, J. (eds.), Medical Primatology, 1970: Second Conference on Experimental Medicine and Surgery in Primates (N.Y., Sept. 1969). pp. 356–375, Basel, Switzerland, S. Karger, 1971. [DF]Google Scholar

Pribram, K. H.Languages of the Brain. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. N. J., 1971. [JG]Google Scholar

Rashbass, C.The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye-movements. Journal of Physiology. 159: 326–338, 1961. [JG]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Redding, G. M.Simultaneous visual adaptation to tilt and displacement: a test of independent processes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 2: 41–42, 1973a. [SE]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Visual adaptation to tilt and displacement: same or different processes. Perception and Psychophysics. 14:193–200, 1973b. [SE]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simultaneous visuomotor adaptation to optical tilt and displacement. Perception and Psychophysics. 17:97–100, 1975. [SE]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Additivity in adaptation to optical tilt. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 4:178–190, 1978. [GR]Google Scholar

Riggs, L. A. Saccadic suppression of phosphenes: proof of a neural basis for saccadic suppression. In: Monty, R. A. and Senders, J. W. (eds.), Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 85–100, 1976. [RH]Google Scholar

Robinson, D. L. & Wurtz, R. H.Use of an extraretinal signal by monkey superior colliculus neurons to distinguish real from self-induced stimulus movement. Journal of Neurophysiology 39: 852–870, 1976. [VH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rock, I. & Ebenholtz, S.The relational determination of perceived size. Psychological Review. 66: 387–401, 1959. [AM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roland, P. E.Sensory feedback to cerebral cortex during voluntary movements in man. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1: 129–147, 1978. [JK, PR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roland, P. E. & Ladegaard-Pedersen, H.A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man. Brain. 100: 671–692, 1977. [PR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Larsen, B., Lassen, N. A., & Skinhøj, E.The role of the supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in the organization of voluntary movements in man. Journal of Neurophysiology. Submitted for publication, 1979a. [PR]Google Scholar

Skinhøj, E., Lassen, N. A., & Larsen, B.The role of different cortical areas in man in the organization of voluntary movements in extrapersonal space. Journal of Neurophysiology. Submitted for publication, 1979b. [PR]Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (eds.), Artifact in Behavioral Research. Academic Press, New York, 1969. [RD]Google Scholar

Rosnow, R. L. & Rosenthal, R. Volunteer effects in behavioral research. In: New Directions in Psychology, Vol. 4. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 213–277, 1970. [RD]Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. A.A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review. 82: 225–269, 1975. [JK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, G.Two visual systems. Science. 163: 895–902, 1969. [HM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R. M. Automatic and controlled information processing in vision. In: LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S. J. (eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Perception and Comprehension. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1977. [GR]Google Scholar

Shaw, R. & Pittenger, J. Perceiving the face of change in changing faces: implications for a theory of object perception. In: Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (eds.), Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1977. [MT]Google Scholar

Shaw, R. & Turvey, M. T. Coalitions as models for ecosystems: a realist perspective on perceptual organization. In: Kubovy, M. and Pomerantz, J. (eds.), Perceptual Organization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., in press. [MT]Google Scholar

Shaw, R., Turvey, M. T., & Mace, W. Ecological psychology: the consequences of a commitment to realism. In: Weimer, W. & Palermo, D. (eds.), Cognition and the Symbolic Processes II. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., in press. [MT]Google Scholar

Shebilske, W. L.Extraretinal information in corrective saccades and inflow vs. outflow theories of visual direction constancy. Vision Research. 16: 621–628, 1976. [KP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Visuomotor coordination in visual direction and position constancies. In: Epstein, W. (ed.), Perception Stability and Constancy: Mechanisms and Processes. Wiley, New York, 1977. [SE, JK, WS, RBW]Google Scholar

Shebilske, W. L. & Nice, D. S.Optical insignificance of the nose and the Pinocchio effect in free scan visual direction. Perception and Psychophysics. 20: 17–20, 1976. [WS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, G. & Day, R. H.Spatial adaptation and aftereffect with optically transformed vision. Effects of active and passive responding and the relationship between test and exposure responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 71: 725–731, 1966a. [BC, GS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sensory and perceptual spatial adaptation with aftereffect: evidence for two processes. In: Perceptual Development: Its Relation to Theories of Intelligence and Cognition. Institute of Juvenile Research, Chicago, pp. 187–209, 1966b. [GS]Google Scholar

The effects of spatial judgments on the perceptual aftereffect from prismati-cally transformed vision. Australian Journal of Psychology. 18:63–70, 1966c. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skavenski, A. A.Extraretinal correction and memory for target position. Vision Research. 11: 743–746, 1971. [PR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

The nature and role of extraretinal eye position information in visual localization. In: Monty, R. A. and Senders, J. W. (eds.), Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. Erlbaum, New York, 1976. [WS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skavenski, A. A. & Steinman, R. M.Control of eye position in the dark. Vision Research. 10: 193–203, 1970. [WS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sommerhoff, G.Logic of the Living Brain. Wiley, New York, 1974. [LH]Google Scholar

Srinivasan, M. V. & Bernard, G. D.The pursuit response of the housefly and its interaction with the optomotor response. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 115: 107–117, 1977. [MT]Google Scholar

Stark, L., Kong, R., Schwartz, S., Hendry, D., & Bridgeman, B.Saccadic suppression of image displacement. Vision Research. 16: 1185–1187, 1976. [AM]Google ScholarPubMed

Stevens, J. K., Emerson, R. C., Gerstein, T. K., Neufeld, G. R., Nichols, C. W., & Rosenquist, A. C.Paralysis of the awake human: visual perceptions. Vision Research. 16: 93–98, 1976. [WS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stratton, G. M.Vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychological Review. 4: 341–360, 463–481, 1897. [AM, HW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taub, E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. In: Keogh, J., (ed.), Exercise and Sports Sciences Reviews, Vol. 4, Journal Publishing Affiliates, Santa Barbara, pp. 335–374, 1977. [JK]Google Scholar

Taylor, J. G.The Behavioral Basis of Perception. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1962. [IK, KP]Google Scholar

Templeton, W. B., Howard, I. P., & Lowman, A. E.Passively generated adaptation to prismatic distortion. Perceptual Motor Skills. 22: 140–142, 1966. [BC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thoden, V., Dichgaus, J., & Savidis, T.Direction-specific optokinetic modulation of monosynaptic hind limb reflexes in cats. Experimental Brain Research. 30: 155–160, 1977. [JK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Trevarthen, C. B.Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung. 31: 299–337, 1968. [HM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Turvey, M. T.Contrasting orientations to the theory of visual information processing. Psychological Review. 84: 67–78, 1977a. [JK, MT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In: Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (eds.), Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 211–266, 1977b. [JK]Google Scholar

Tversky, A.Features of similarity. Psychological Review. 84: 327–350, 1977. [LH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uhlarik, J. J. & Canon, L. K.Influence of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 91: 233–239, 1971. [GR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Uttal, R. W.The effect of deviations from linearity on the detection of dotted line patterns. Vision Research. 13: 2155–2163, 1973. [JG]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Varju, D.Stationary and dynamic responses during visual edge fixation by walking insects. Nature. 255: 330–332, 1975. [MT]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vonèche, J.Les Effets Consécutifs Figuraux. Vander, Brussels, 1971. [JV]Google Scholar

von Holst, E. & Mittelstaedt, H. The principle of reafference: interactions between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. In: Dodwell, P. C. (ed. and trans.), Perceptual Processing: Stimulus Equivalence and Pattern Recognition. (Reprinted from Die Naturwissenschaften, 1950.) Appleton, New York, 1971. [WS]Google Scholar

Walk, R. D. & Bond, E. K.The development of visually guided reaching in monkeys reared without sight of the hands. Psychonomic Science. 23: 115–116, 1971. [RDW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walk, R. D., Shepherd, J. D., & Miller, D. R.Attention as an alternative to self-induced motion for the perceptual behavior of kittens. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, Vol. 4. (Abstract No. 395, p. 129) 8th Annual Meeting, St. Louis, Mo., November 5–9, 1978. [RDW]Google Scholar

Wallach, H.On Perception. Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Co., New York, 1976. [HW]Google Scholar

Wallach, H. & Bacon, J.The constancy of the orientation of the visual field. Perception & Psychophysics. 19: 375–382, 1976. [HW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Two kinds of adaptation in the constancy of visual direction and their different effects on the perception of shape and visual direction. Perception & Psychophysics. 21:227–242, 1977. [HW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, H. & Barton, W.Adaptation to optically produced curvature of frontal planes. Perception & Psychophysics. 18: 21–25, 1975. [HW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, H. & Flaherty, E. W.Rapid adaptation to a prismatic distortion. Perception & Psychophysics. 19: 261–266, 1976. [HW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, H., Frey, K. J., and Bode, K. A.The nature of adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues. Perception & Psychophysics. 11: 110–116, 1972. [JG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, H. and Halperin, P.Eye muscle potentiation does not account for adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues. Perception & Psychophysics. 22: 427–430, 1977. [JG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, H. & Kravitz, J.The measurement of the constancy of visual direction and of its adaptation. Psychonomic Science. 2: 217–218, 1965a. [AM, HW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rapid adaptation in the constancy of visual direction with active and passive rotation. Psychonomic Science. 3:165–166, 1965b. [AM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walls, G. L.The problem of visual direction. American Journal of Optome-try. 28: 55–83, 115–146, 173–212, 1951. [JH]Google ScholarPubMed

Wapner, S. & Werner, H.Perceptual Development, Clark Univ. Press, Worcester, Mass., 1957.Google Scholar

Ware, C. & Mitchell, D. E.The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect. Vision Research. 14: 735–737, 1974. [MS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Warren, D. H. & Schmitt, T. L.On the plasticity of visual-proprioceptive bias effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 4: 302–310, 1978. [JK, GR]Google ScholarPubMed

Watson, P. J.Nonmotor functions of the cerebellum. Psychological Bulletin. 85: 944–967, 1978. [DF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weinstein, S., Sersen, E. A., Fisher, L., & Weisinger, M.Is reafference necessary for visual adaptation? Perceptual Motor Skills 18: 641–648, 1964. [BC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Welch, R. B.Perceptual Modification: Adaptation to Altered Sensory Environments. Academic Press, New York, 1978. [RH, IR]Google Scholar

Westheimer, G. & McKee, S. P.Integration regions for visual hyperacuity. Vision Research. 17: 89–93, 1977. [JL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

White, M. J.Hemispheric asymmetries in tachistoscopic information processing. British Journal of Psychology. 63: 497–508, 1972. [DF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Willey, R., Gyr, J. W., and Henry, A.Changes in the perception of spatial location: a test of potentiation vs. recalibration theory. Perception & Psychophysics. 24(4):356–360, 1968. [JG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witkin, H. A. & Goodenough, D. R.Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 84: 661–689, 1977. [DF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zacks, J. L. & Freedman, S. J.Active and passive movement in the production of kinesthetic tilt aftereffects. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 16: 702, 1963. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar