Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:33:18.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who tailors the blanket?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

Keisuke Suzuki Open the ORCID record for Keisuke Suzuki [Opens in a new window] ,
Katsunori Miyahara  and
Kengo Miyazono
Keisuke Suzuki
Affiliation:
Center for Human Nature, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroscience (CHAIN), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, [email protected] https://sites.google.com/view/keisukesuzuki/ [email protected] https://kmiyahara.weebly.com/
Katsunori Miyahara
Affiliation:
Center for Human Nature, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroscience (CHAIN), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, [email protected] https://sites.google.com/view/keisukesuzuki/ [email protected] https://kmiyahara.weebly.com/
Kengo Miyazono
Affiliation:
Center for Human Nature, Artificial Intelligence, and Neuroscience (CHAIN), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, [email protected] https://sites.google.com/view/keisukesuzuki/ [email protected] https://kmiyahara.weebly.com/ Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, [email protected] http://kengomiyazono.weebly.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The gap between the Markov blanket and ontological boundaries arises from the former's inability to capture the dynamic process through which biological and cognitive agents actively generate their own boundaries with the environment. Active inference in the free-energy principle (FEP) framework presupposes the existence of a Markov blanket, but it is not a process that actively generates the latter.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e213
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (2010). Memento's revenge: The extended mind, extended. In Menary, R. (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 43–66). MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (2017). How to knit your own Markov blanket: Resisting the second law with metamorphic minds. In Metzinger, T. & Wiese, W. (Eds.), Philosophy and predictive processing: 3. MIND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958573031Google Scholar
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, M. D., & Di Paolo, E. (2009) Integrating autopoiesis and behavior: An exploration in computational chemo-ethology. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K. (2010) The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K. (2013). Life as we know it. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 10(86), 20130475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, T., & Suzuki, K. (2008). From a homeostatic to a homeodynamic self. BioSystems, 91(2), 388–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirchhoff, M. D. (2018). Autopoiesis, free energy, and the life–mind continuity thesis. Synthese, 195(6), 2519–2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, M. D., & Kiverstein, J. (2021). How to determine the boundaries of the mind: A Markov blanket proposal. Synthese, 198(5), 4791–4810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyahara, K., Ransom, T. G., & Gallagher, S. (2020). What the situation affords: Habit and heedful interrelations in skilled performance. In Caruana, F. & Testa, I. (Eds.), Habit: Pragmatist approaches from cognitive neurosciences to social sciences (pp. 120–136). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyahara, K., & Robertson, I. (2021) The pragmatic intelligence of habits. Topoi, 40, 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazono, K. (2017). Does functionalism entail extended mind?. Synthese, 194(9), 3523–3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, K., & Ikegami, T. (2009). Shapes and self-movement in protocell systems. Artificial Life, 15(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F. R. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. North Holland.Google Scholar
Varela, F. R., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. BioSystems, 5, 187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed