Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:03:33.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Which evolutionary process, and where do we want to go?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

Bjørn Grinde*
Affiliation:
Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway. [email protected]://grinde.wikispaces.com

Abstract

Taking an evolutionary perspective on human nature is highly commendable when the purpose is to improve society. Changing the course of human evolution is more questionable – in the biological sense of the term. The “science of intentional change” should preferably have a terminology that distinguishes between genetic changes and cultural transformation, and it needs a direction.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdallah, S., Michaelson, J., Shah, S., Stoll, L. & Marks, N. (2012) The Happy Planet Index: 2012 report. New Economic Foundation.Google Scholar
Eaton, S. B., Konner, M. & Shostak, M. (1988) Stone Agers in the fast lane: Chronic degenerative diseases in evolutionary perspective. American Journal of Medicine 84:739–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinde, B. (2004) Darwinian happiness: Can the evolutionary perspective on well-being help us improve society? World Futures – Journal of General Evolution 60:317–29.Google Scholar
Grinde, B. (2009) An evolutionary perspective on the importance of social relations for quality of life. The Scientific World Journal 9:588605.Google Scholar
Grinde, B. (2012) The biology of happiness. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar