Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:24:53.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When imagination is difficult: Metacognitive experiences at the fault lines of reality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2008

Lawrence J. Sanna
Lawrence J. Sanna
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolinaat Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270. [email protected]://www.unc.edu/~sanna
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Imagination and rational thought may be guided by identical principles, and Byrne's (2005) analysis expertly synthesizes a diverse literature on counterfactual thinking. Further attention should be paid to metacognitive experiences, like ease or difficulty of thought generation, which accompany the imaginative process. Only by considering metacognitive experiences along with the content of what people imagine can we fully understand imagination.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 5-6 , December 2007 , pp. 464 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodenhausen, G. V. & Wyer, R. S. (1987) Social cognition and social reality: Information acquisition and use in the laboratory and the real world. In: Social information processing and survey methodology, ed. Hippler, H. J., Schwarz, N. & Sudman, S., pp. 6–41. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. M. J. (2005) The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, B. (1975) Hindsight≠foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgments under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1:288–99.Google Scholar
Guilbault, R. L., Bryant, F. B., Posavac, E. J. & Brockway, J. H. (2004) A meta-analysis of research on hindsight bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 26:103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, E. M., Carlsen, K. A. & Loftus, G. R. (2004) The “saw-it-all-along” effect: Demonstrations of visual hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30:960–68.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. A. & Hastie, R. (1990) Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin 107:311–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Miller, D. (1986) Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 93:136–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1982) The simulation heuristic. In: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, ed. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A., pp. 201–208. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L. & Collins, A. (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanna, L. J. & Schwarz, N. (2006) Metacognitive experiences and human judgment: The case of hindsight bias and its debiasing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15:172–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanna, L. J. & Schwarz, N. (2007) Metacognitive experiences and hindsight bias: It's not just the thought (content) that counts! Social Cognition 25:185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanna, L. J., Schwarz, N. & Small, E. M. (2002a) Accessibility experiences and the hindsight bias: I knew it all along versus it could never have happened. Memory and Cognition 30:1288–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanna, L. J., Schwarz, N. & Stocker, S. L. (2002b) When debiasing backfires: Accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28:497–502.Google ScholarPubMed
Sanna, L. J., Turley-Ames, K. J. & Meier, S. (1999) Mood, self-esteem, and simulated alternatives: Thought-provoking affective influences on counterfactual direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:543–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I. & Yoon, C. (2007) Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 39:127–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werth, L. & Strack, F. (2003) An inferential approach to the knew-it-all-along phenomenon. Memory 11:411–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar