Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-01T08:17:21.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What do working-memory tests really measure?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Michael J. Kane ,
Andrew R. A. Conway  and
Randall W. Engle
Michael J. Kane
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303-3083 [email protected]
Andrew R. A. Conway
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 30332-0170 [email protected]
Randall W. Engle
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0170 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individuals may differ in the general-attention executive component or in the subordinate domain-specific “slave” components of working memory. Tasks requiring sustained memory representations across attention shifts are reliable, valid indices of executive abilities. Measures emphasizing specific processing skills may increase reliability within restricted samples but will not reflect the attention component responsible for the broad predictive validity of span tasks.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 101 - 102
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)