Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:44:03.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What about the increasing adaptive value of manipulative language use?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

David Kemmerer
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260. [email protected]

Abstract

Dunbar (1993) emphasizes the role of cooperative language use in the evolution of human linguistic capacity and neglects to consider the role that manipulative language use would have played. I argue that as group size and neocortieal size increased during human evolution, the adaptive value of using language to benefit oneself at the expense of others would also have increased. I discuss how selection pressures for manipulative language use would have operated in the contexts of mating, status striving, and social exchange.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkow, J. H. (1989) Darwin, sex, and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. University of Toronto Press. [DK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:149. [DK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1994) The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. Basic Books. [DK]Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Dedden, L. A. (1990) Derogation of competitors. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships 7:395422. [DK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J.. Oxford University Press. [DK]Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J. R. (1978) Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In: Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach, ed. Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.. Sinauer. [DK]Google Scholar
Dean, D. (1993) Vocal grooming: Man the schmoozer. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:699700. [DK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugatldn, L. A. & Wilson, D. S. (1993) Language and levels of selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:701. [DK]Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993a) Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:681735. [DK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993r) On the origins of language: A history of constraints and windows of opportunity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:721729. [DK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M., Duncan, N. D. C. & Marriott, A. (submitted) Human conversational behaviour: a functional approach. Human Nature. [RIMD]Google Scholar
Enquist, M. & Leimar, O. (1993) The evolution of cooperation in mobile organisms. Animal Behaviour 45:747757. [RIMD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, D. & McNamara, P. (1995) Parent-offspring conflict as a selection pressure for the evolution of language. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evaluation Society, Santa Barbara, CA. [DK]Google Scholar
Miller, G. F. (1994) Evolution of the human brain through runaway sexual selection: The mind as a protean courtship device. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. [RIMD, DK]Google Scholar
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:707784. [DK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, M. (1994) The Red Queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. Macmillan. [DK]Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin/Cummings. [DK]Google Scholar
Wright, R. (1994) The moral animal: The new science of evolutionary psychology Pantheon. [DK]Google Scholar