Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:06:41.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unimodal experience constrains while multisensory experiences enrich cognitive construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2008

Andrew J. Bremner  and
Charles Spence
Andrew J. Bremner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, United Kingdom
Charles Spence
Affiliation:
Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom. [email protected]/psychology/staff/[email protected]/xmodal/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mareschal and his colleagues argue that cognition consists of partial representations emerging from organismic constraints placed on information processing through development. However, any notion of constraints must consider multiple sensory modalities, and their gradual integration across development. Multisensory integration constitutes one important way in which developmental constraints may lead to enriched representations that serve more than immediate behavioural goals.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 335 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R. & Flom, R. (2004) Intersensory redundancy guides infants' selective attention, perception, and cognition in infancy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13:99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, A. J., Mareschal, D., Lloyd-Fox, S. & Spence, C. (2008) Spatial localization of touch in the first year of life: Early influence of a visual spatial code and the development of remapping across changes in limb position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137:149–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J. (1969) Principles of perceptual learning and development. Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Lewkowicz, D. J. (2000) Perceptual development: Visual, auditory and speech perception in infancy. American Journal of Psychology 113:488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mareschal, D., Johnson, M. H., Sirois, S., Spratling, M., Thomas, M. & Westermann, G. (2007a) Neuroconstructivism, vol. I: How the brain constructs cognition. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neil, P. A., Chee-Ruiter, C., Scheier, C., Lewkowicz, D. J. & Shimojo, S. (2006) Development of multisensory spatial integration and perception in humans. Developmental Science 9:454–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips-Silver, J. & Trainor, L. J. (2005) Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science 308:1430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1953) The origins of intelligence in the child, trans. Cook, M.. Routledge & Kegan-Paul. (Originally published in French in 1936).Google Scholar
von Hofsten, C. (2004) An action perspective on motor development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:266–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westermann, G., Sirois, S., Shultz, T. & Mareschal, D. (2006) Modeling developmental cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:227–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed