No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Unconscious goals: Specific or unspecific? The potential harm of the goal/gene analogy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2014
Abstract
Huang & Bargh's (H&B's) definition of goals is ambiguous between “specific goals” – the end-state of a token action I am about to perform – and “unspecific goals” – the end-state of an action-type (without specifying how this would be achieved). The analogy with selfish genes pushes the authors towards the former interpretation, but the latter would provide a more robust theoretical framework.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P. F. & Le Bihan, D. (1998) Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature
395:597–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2000) The replicator in retrospect. Biology and Philosophy
15:403–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, M. A. (2011) Transforming vision into action. Vision Research
51:1567–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanay, B. (2002) The return of the replicator: What is philosophically significant in a general account of replication and selection?
Biology and Philosophy
17:109–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Unconscious goals: Specific or unspecific? The potential harm of the goal/gene analogy
Related commentaries (1)
The Selfish Goal: Autonomously operating motivational structures as the proximate cause of human judgment and behavior