Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:09:28.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time allocation, religious observance, and illness in Mayan horticulturalists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

David Waynforth
David Waynforth
Affiliation:
The Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.uea.ac.uk/med/People/Academic/David+Waynforth#info
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of individual differences in religious observance in a Belizean community showed that the most religious (pastors and church workers) reported more illnesses, and that there was no tendency for the religiously observant to restrict their interactions to family or extended family. Instead, the most religiously observant tended to have community roles that widened their social contact: religion did not aid isolation – thus violating a key assumption of the parasite-stress theory of sociality.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 98 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kramer, K. (2005) Children's help and the pace of reproduction: Cooperative breeding in humans. Evolutionary Anthropology 14:224–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzban, R. & Leary, M. R. (2001) Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin 127(2):187–208.Google Scholar
Sosis, R. (2003) Why aren't we all Hutterities? Costly signaling theory and religious behavior. Human Nature–An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective 14:91–127.Google Scholar
Waynforth, D. (1999) Differences in time use for mating and nepotistic effort as a function of male attractiveness in rural Belize. Evolution and Human Behavior 20:19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar