Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:29:23.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three scientists in search of a theorist (apologies to Pirandello)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Robert T. Brown
Robert T. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, N.C. 28406
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 440 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrew, R. J.Vocalization in chicks and the concept of “stimulus contrast” Animal Behavior. 12:64–76, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. T. & Hamilton, A. S.Imprinting: Effects of discrepancy from rearing conditions on approach to a familiar imprinting object in a novel situation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 91:784–793, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, R. B. Attachment and dependency: A psychobiological and social-learning synthesis. In: Gewirtz, J. L. (ed), Attachment and Dependency. Winston, Washington, D.C., 1972.Google Scholar
Hall, T. L. Individual differences and the ontogeny of attachment responses in domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
Hall, T. L. & Brown, R. T.Individual differences and the ontogeny of attachment in domestic chicks.Paper delivered at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1977.Google Scholar
Hodos, W. & Campbell, C. B. G.Scala naturae: why there is no theory in comparative psychology. Psychological Review. 76:337–350, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrman, D. S.A critique of Konrad Lorenz's theory of instinctive behavior. Quarterly Review of Biology. 28:337–363, 1953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockard, R. B.Reflections on the fall of comparative psychology: Is there a message for us all? American Psychologist. 26:168–179, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A., Chess, S., Birch, B. G., Hertzig, M. & Korn, S.Behavioral individuality in early childhood. New York University Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar