Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:39:25.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A theory explaining sex differences in high mathematical ability has been around for some time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Hoben Thomas
Hoben Thomas*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 187 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, B. J. & Hedges, L. V. (1988) The effects of selection and variability in studies of gender differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:183–84.Google Scholar
Benbow, C. P. (1988) Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes [with commentary and response]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:169–232.Google Scholar
Benbow, C. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1980) Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science 210:1262–64.Google Scholar
Benbow, C. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1983) Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science 222:1029–31.Google Scholar
Boles, D. B. (1980) X-linkage of spatial ability: A critical review. Child Development 51:625–35.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L. G. (1988) Sex differences in variability may be more important than sex differences in means. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:195–96.Google Scholar
Keating, D. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1972) Extreme measures for the exceptionally gifted in mathematics and science. Educational Researcher 1:3–7.Google Scholar
McKusick, V. A. (1983) Mendelian inheritance in man (6th edition). Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McNemar, Q. (1942) The revision of the Stanford-Binet Scale. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Post, R. H. (1962) Population differences in red and green color vision deficiency: A review and query on selection relaxation. Eugenics Quarterly 9:131–46.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. (1982) A strong developmental theory of field dependence-independence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 26:169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H. (1983) Familial correlational analyses, sex differences, and the X-linked gene hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 93:427–40.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. (1985) A theory of high mathematical aptitude. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 29:231–42.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. (1987) Modeling X-linked mediated development: Sex differences in the service of a simple model. In: Formal methods in developmental psychology, ed. Bisanz, J., Brainerd, C. & Kail, R.. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. (1988) Simple tests implied by a genetic X-linked model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 41:179–91.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, S. G. (1988) Could sex differences be due to genes? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:212–14.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B. & Wapner, S. (1954) Personality through perception. Harper.Google Scholar
Zohar, A. & Guttman, R. (1988) The forgotten realm of genetic differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:217.Google Scholar