Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:21:05.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specificity in a global array is only one possibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2005

Eric L. Amazeen  and
Guy C. Van Orden
Eric L. Amazeen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287
Guy C. Van Orden
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The suggestion of seeking specificity in a higher-order array is attractive, but Stoffregen & Bardy (S&B) fail to provide a compelling empirical basis to their claim that specificity exists solely in the global array. Using the example of relative motion, the alternate hypotheses that must be considered are presented.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 887 - 888
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Commentary onT. A. Stoffregen & B. G. Bardy (2001). On specification and the senses. BBS 24(2):195–261.