Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:25:09.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The socio-ecological approach turns variance among populations from a liability to an asset

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2010

Selin Kesebir ,
Shigehiro Oishi  and
Barbara A. Spellman
Selin Kesebir
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400. [email protected]://people.virginia.edu/[email protected]://people.virginia.edu/~so5x/[email protected]://people.virginia.edu/~bas6g/
Shigehiro Oishi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400. [email protected]://people.virginia.edu/[email protected]://people.virginia.edu/~so5x/[email protected]://people.virginia.edu/~bas6g/
Barbara A. Spellman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400. [email protected]://people.virginia.edu/[email protected]://people.virginia.edu/~so5x/[email protected]://people.virginia.edu/~bas6g/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We emphasize the value of the socio-ecological approach in addressing the problem of population variances. The socio-ecological perspective studies how social and natural habitats shape human behaviors, and are in turn shaped by those behaviors. This focus on system-level factors is particularly well-suited to studying the origins of group differences in human behavior.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 96 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S. & Slone, L. R. (1976) Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34:366–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. & Schaller, M. (2008) Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Science 275:1279–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N. S., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q. & Tracer, D. (2005a) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6):795–815; discussion 815–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H. & Markus, H. R. (1999) Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:785–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K. & Ramaswamy, J. (2006) Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan's “Northern Frontier.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:369–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98:224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oishi, S. (in press) The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Google Scholar
Oishi, S. & Graham, J. (in press) Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science..Google Scholar
Oishi, S., Ishii, K. & Lun, J. (2009a) Residential mobility and conditionality of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45:913–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S. & Snyder, B. H. (2009b) Sociology: A lost connection in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 13:334–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oishi, S., Lun, J. & Sherman, G. D. (2007) Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93:131–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stutchbury, B. J. M. & Morton, E. S. (2001) Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Uskul, A. K., Kitayama, S. & Nisbett, R. E. (2008) Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105(25):8552–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H. & Schug, J. (2008) Preferences versus strategies for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science 19:579–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed