Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:07:02.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sexual selection and social roles: Two models or one?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Pierre L. van den Berghe
Pierre L. van den Berghe
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-3340. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nothing is gained by opposing “sexual selection” and “social roles,” or by proclaiming the supremacy of one over the other. Instead, we should develop a unitary model of gene-culture coevolution, allowing for the complex interaction of both, and varying importance of each, all within our double, species-specific, adaptive, evolutionary track.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 3-4 , August 2009 , pp. 291 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, D. (1983) Why there are so few women warriors. Behavior Science Research 18:196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. D. (1979) Darwinism and human affairs. University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. & Irons, W. (1979) Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective. Duxbury.Google Scholar
Lumsden, C. J. & Wilson, E. O. (1981) Genes, mind, and culture: The coevolutionary process. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, J. A. (2008) Women, armies, and warfare in early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar