Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:14:33.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex, aggression, and life history strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Aurelio José Figueredo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0068. [email protected]/[email protected]
Paul Robert Gladden
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0068. [email protected]/[email protected]
Barbara Hagenah Brumbach
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northern Arizona University, P. O. Box 15106, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5036. [email protected]

Abstract

We agree that sexual selection is a more comprehensive explanation for sex differences in direct aggression than social role theory, which is an unparsimonious and vestigial remnant of human exceptionalism. Nevertheless, Archer misses several opportunities to put the theoretical predictions made by himself and by others into direct competition in a way that would further the interests of strong inference.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Figueredo, A. J., Gladden, P. R., Andrzejczak, D. J., Jones, D. N. & Smith-Castro, V.(in preparation) Life history strategy, executive functioning, and negative androcenrism.Google Scholar
Gladden, P. R., Sisco, M. & Figueredo, A. J. (2008) Sexual coercion and life history strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior 29:319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, J. R. (1964) Strong inference. Science 146:347–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed