Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:46:32.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rome was not built in one day: Underlying biological and cognitive factors responsible for the emergence of agriculture and ultrasociality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

Jason Grotuss
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224. [email protected]@unf.eduhttp://grotuss.weebly.comhttp://wolfflabunf.weebly.com/about-sarah-beard.html
Sarah Jean Beard
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224. [email protected]@unf.eduhttp://grotuss.weebly.comhttp://wolfflabunf.weebly.com/about-sarah-beard.html

Abstract

Agriculture represented a major transition in human evolution, but the appearance of ultrasociality must have included previous steps. We argue that ultrasociality would not have suddenly emerged with agriculture, but rather developed from pre-existing cognitive and social mechanisms. Discussions must include necessary depth about the historical origins of human ultrasociality, and agriculture's aftereffects on large-scale social organization.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basu, S. & Waymire, G. B. (2006) Recordkeeping and human evolution. Accounting Horizons 20:201–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berwick, R. C., Friederici, A. D., Chomsky, N. & Bolhuis, J. J. (2013) Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17:8998.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C. & Benítez-Burraco, A. (2014) The shape of the human language-ready brain. Frontiers in Psychology 5:282. (Online publication). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, J.-K. & Bowles, S. (2007) The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318:636–40.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2014) The gradual evolution of language. Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 27:3960.Google Scholar
Dahlman, S., Ljungqvist, P. & Johannesson, M. (2007) Reciprocity in young children. Working Paper, Stockholm School of Economics. Available at: http://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/hastef/0674.html Google Scholar
Drummond, H. (2006) Dominance in vertebrate broods and litters. The Quarterly Review of Biology 81:332.Google Scholar
Fry, D. & Söderberg, P. (2013) Lethal aggression in mobile forager bands and implications for the origins of war. Science 341:270–73.Google Scholar
Guilmet, G. M. (1977) The evolution of tool-using and tool-making behaviour. Man 12:3347.Google Scholar
Hare, B. (2007) From nonhuman to human mind what changed and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science 16:6064.Google Scholar
Hay, D. F. & Cook, K. V. (2007) The transformation of prosocial behavior from infancy to childhood. In: Socioemotional development in the toddler years, ed. Brownell, C. & Kopp, C. B., pp. 100–31. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2004) Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 53(1):335.Google Scholar
Holekamp, K. E. & Smale, L. (1991) Dominance acquisition during mammalian social development: The “inheritance” of maternal rank. American Zoologist 31:306–17.Google Scholar
House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B., Boyette, A., Hewlett, B., McElreath, R. & Laurence, S. (2013) The ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110:14586–91.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2005) Evolutionary context of human development: The cooperative breeding model. In: Attachment and bonding: A new synthesis, ed. Carter, C. S., Anhert, L., Grossmann, K. E., Hrdy, S. B., Lamb, M. E., Porges, S. W. & Sachser, N., pp. 932. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kenward, B. & Dahl, M. (2011) Preschoolers distribute scarce resources according to the moral valence of recipients' previous actions. Developmental Psychology 47:1054–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahaney, R. A. (2014) Lithic analysis as a cognitive science: A framework. Lithic Technology 39:173–89.Google Scholar
Nóbrega, V. A. & Miyagawa, S. (2015) The precedence of syntax in the rapid emergence of human language in evolution as defined by the integration hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology 6:271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00271.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. & Highfield, R. (2011) SuperCooperators: Altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed. The Free Press/Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Enesco, C., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V. & Colmenares, F. (2013) Two and a half-year-old children are prosocial even when their partners are not. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 116:186–98.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A., Hill, K., Marlowe, F., Nolin, D., Wiessner, P., Gurven, M., Bowles, S., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Hertz, T. & Bell, A. (2010) Wealth transmission and inequality among hunter-gatherers. Current Anthropology 51:1934.Google Scholar
Thorpe, I. J. (2003) Anthropology, archaeology, and the origin of warfare. World Archaeology 35(1):145–65. doi: 10.1080/0043824032000079198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. & Moll, H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:675–91.Google Scholar
Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. (2006) Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311:13011303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. (2009) The roots of human altruism. British Journal of Psychology 100:455–71.Google Scholar
Warneken, F. & Tomasello, M. (2013) Parental presence and encouragement do not influence helping in young children. Infancy 18:345–68.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Van Vugt, M. & O'Gorman, R. (2008) Multilevel selection theory and major evolutionary transitions implications for psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17:69.Google Scholar