Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:59:02.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reuse or re-function?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

Daniela Aisenberg  and
Avishai Henik
Daniela Aisenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel. [email protected]@bgu.ac.ilhttp://www.bgu.ac.il/~henik
Avishai Henik
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel. [email protected]@bgu.ac.ilhttp://www.bgu.ac.il/~henik
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simple specialization cannot account for brain functioning. Yet, we believe Anderson's reuse can be better explained by re-function. We suggest that functional demands shape brain changes and are the driving force behind reuse. For example, we suggest that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is built as an infrastructure for multi-functions rather than as a module for reuse.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 266 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashkenazi, S., Henik, A., Ifergane, G. & Shelef, I. (2008) Basic numerical processing in left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) acalculia. Cortex 44:439–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D. & Carter, C. S. (2004) Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:539–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L. & Brannon, E. M. (2009) Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13:83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S. (2005) Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In: From monkey brain to human brain, ed. Dehaene, S., Duhamel, J.-R., Hauser, M. D. & Rizolatti, G., pp. 133–57. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S. & Cohen, L. (2007) Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56:384–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, J. (2001) An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2:820–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henik, A. & Tzelgov, J. (1982) Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory and Cognition 10:389–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W. III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A. & Carter, C. S. (2004) Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303:1023–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, R. M. (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4:138–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, E. K. (2000) The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 1:59–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I. & Cohen, Y. (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Attention and performance X, ed. Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D., pp. 531–56. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A. & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004) The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306:443–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozin, P. (1976) The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious. In: Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology, vol. 6, ed. Sprague, J. A. & Epstein, A. N., pp. 245–80. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, A., Hayes, A., Henik, A., Danziger, S. & Rafal, R. (2004) Parietal lobe lesions disrupt saccadic remapping of inhibitory location tagging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16:503–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapir, A., Soroker, N., Berger, A. & Henik, A. (1999) Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation. Nature Neuroscience 2:1053–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed