Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:46:25.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative state, social comparison reactions, and the behavioral constellation of deprivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Dallas Novakowski  and
Sandeep Mishra
Dallas Novakowski
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada. [email protected]
Sandeep Mishra
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business Administration, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pepper & Nettle compellingly synthesize evidence indicating that temporal discounting is a functional, adaptive response to deprivation. In this commentary, we underscore the importance of the psychology of relative state, which is an index of relative competitive (dis)advantage. We then highlight two proximate emotional social comparison reactions linked with relative state – personal relative deprivation and envy – that may play an important role in the deprivation-discounting link.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, R., Piquero, N. L. & Cullen, F. T. (2009) General strain theory and white-collar crime. In: The criminology of white-collar crime, ed. Simpson, S. S. & Weisburd, D., pp. 35–60. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callan, M. J., Kim, H. & Matthews, W. J. (2015) Predicting self-rated mental and physical health: The contributions of subjective socioeconomic status and personal relative deprivation. Frontiers in Psychology 6:1415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callan, M. J., Shead, N. W. & Olson, J. M. (2011) Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(5):955–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. (2014) The son also rises: Surnames and the history of social mobility. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, M. (2016) Killing the competition: Economic inequality and homicide. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Garay, J. & Móri, T. F. (2011) Is envy one of the possible evolutionary roots of charity? Biosystems 106(1):28–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1):17–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishra, S. (2014) Decision-making under risk: Integrating perspectives from biology, economics, and psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 18(3):280–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishra, S., Barclay, P. & Sparks, A. (2017) The relative state model: Integrating need-based and ability-based pathways to risk-taking. Personality and Social Psychology Review 21:176–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishra, S. & Carleton, R. N. (2015) Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Social Science & Medicine 147:144–49.Google Scholar
Mishra, S. & Novakowski, D. (2016) Personal relative deprivation and risk: An examination of individual differences in personality, attitudes, and behavioral outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences 90:22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M. & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012) Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 16(3):203–32.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. & Kim, S. H. (2007) Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin 133(1):46–64.Google Scholar
Todd, P. M. & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M. & Pieters, R. (2009) Leveling up and down: The experiences of benign and malicious envy. Emotion 9(3):419–29.Google Scholar