Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T16:35:43.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relational language supports relational cognition in humans and apes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Dedre Gentner  and
Stella Christie
Dedre Gentner
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. [email protected]@northwestern.eduhttp://www.psych.northwestern.edu/psych/people/faculty/gentner/index.htm
Stella Christie
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. [email protected]@northwestern.eduhttp://www.psych.northwestern.edu/psych/people/faculty/gentner/index.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We agree with Penn et al. that our human cognitive superiority derives from our exceptional relational ability. We far exceed other species in our ability to grasp analogies and to combine relations into higher-order structures (Gentner 2003). However, we argue here that possession of an elaborated symbol system – such as human language – is necessary to make our relational capacity operational.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 136 - 137
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Casenhiser, D. & Goldberg, A. E. (2005) Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 8:500–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christie, S. & Gentner, D. (2007) Relational similarity in identity relation: The role of language. In: Proceedings of the Second European Cognitive Science Conference. ed. Vosniadou, S. & Kayser, D.. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1988) Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development 59:47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (2003) Why we're so smart. In: Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, ed. Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S., pp. 195–235. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. & Namy, L. L. (2006) Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15(6):297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Özyürek, A., Goldin-Meadow, S. & Gurcanli, O. (2007) Spatial language potentiates spatial cognition: Turkish homesigners. In: Proceedings of the Second European Cognitive Science Conference. ed. Vosniadou, S. & Kayser, D.. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. & Rattermann, M. J. (1991) Language and the career of similarity. In: Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development, ed. Gelman, S. A. & Byrnes, J. P., pp. 225–77. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003) The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goldmeier, E. (1972) Similarity in visually perceived forms. Psychological Issues 8(1):29–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, P. (2004) Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science 306:496–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halford, G. S. (1987) A structure-mapping approach to cognitive development. The neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Toward an interpretation [Special issue]. International Journal of Psychology 22:609–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haun, D. B. M., Rapold, C., Call, J., Janzen, G. & Levinson, S. C. (2006) Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:17568–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermer-Vasquez, L., Moffet, A. & Munkholm, P. (2001) Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: The case of two spatial memory tasks. Cognition 79:263–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, J. & Gentner, D. (2005) Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology 50(4):315–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Premack, D. (1983b) The codes of man and beast. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaepen, E., Coppola, M, Carey, S., Spelke, E. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007) Language and numerical cognition: The case of Nicaraguan homesigners. In: Proceedings of the Second European Cognitive Science Conference, ed. Vosniadou, S. & Kayser, D.. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. K. R., Oden, D. L. & Boysen, S. T. (1997) Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 23(1):31–43.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000) Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74(3):209–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, E. A., Young, M. E. & Fagot, J. (2001) Effects of number of items on the baboon's discrimination of same from different visual displays. Animal Cognition 4:163–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed