Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-rlsgg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T01:09:25.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy or science of societies?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2025

Marion Blute Open the ORCID record for Marion Blute [Opens in a new window]
Marion Blute*
Affiliation:
Sociology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada [email protected] http://individual.utoronto.ca/marionblute/
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While ambitious, interesting, and generally corresponding to usage in archaeology history, and anthropology, Moffett's paper seems more philosophy of science (conceptual analysis) than science (their use in explanations). It avoids explanations of how “markers of identity” and “their recognition” are acquired (e.g., by biological evolution, individual learning, social learning, or sociocultural evolution) and what the concept of “a society” explains.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e55
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blute, M. (2001). A single-process learning theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 529–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blute, M. (2011). Super cooperators? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26, 624–625. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.014Google Scholar
Blute, M. (2016). Evolution and learning: A response to Watson and Szathmáry. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 31, 891–892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blute, M. (2017). Three modes of evolution by natural selection and drift: A new or an extended evolutionary synthesis? Biological Theory, 12, 67–71. doi:10.1007/s13752-017-0264-8Google Scholar
Blute, M. (2024). Gabriel Tarde and cultural evolution: The consequence of neglecting our Mendel. Journal of Classical Sociology, 24(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X221136830Google Scholar
Blute, M., & Jordan, F.M. (2018) The evolutionary approach to history: Sociocultural phylogenetics. Chpt. 28. In Hopcroft, R. L. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of evolution, biology and society, (pp. 621–640). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kershenbaum, A. (2024). Why animals talk: The new science of animal communication. Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Riris, P., Silva, F., Crema, E., Palmisano, A., Robinson, E., Siegel, P. E., … Ren, X. (2024). Frequent disturbances enhanced the resilience of past human populations. Nature, 629, 837–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07354-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A. (2022). Blind alleys and fruitful pathways in the comparative study of animal cognition. Physics of Life Reviews 43, 211–238. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2022.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar