Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:47:16.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Our evolving beliefs about evolved misbelief

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2010

Ryan T. McKay
Affiliation:
Centre for Anthropology and Mind, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PE, United Kingdom. [email protected]://homepage.mac.com/ryantmckay/
Daniel C. Dennett
Affiliation:
The Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155-7059. [email protected]://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/incbios/dennettd/dennettd.htm

Abstract

The commentaries raise a host of challenging issues and reflect a broad range of views. Some commentators doubt that there is any convincing evidence for adaptive misbelief, and remain (in our view, unduly) wedded to our “default presumption” that misbelief is maladaptive. Others think that the evidence for adaptive misbelief is so obvious, and so widespread, that the label “default presumption” is disingenuous. We try to chart a careful course between these opposing perspectives.

Type
Authors' Response
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Avital, E. & Jablonka, E. (2000) Animal traditions: Behavioural inheritance in evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (1989) The optimal margin of illusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 8:176–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentall, R. P. & Kaney, S. (1996) Abnormalities of self-representation and persecutory delusions: A test of a cognitive model of paranoia. Psychological Medicine 26:1231–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackmore, S. (1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2004) Descartes' baby: How child development explains what makes us human. Arrow Books.Google Scholar
Corlett, P. R., Krystal, J. K., Taylor, J. R. & Fletcher, P. C. (2009b) Why do delusions persist? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3. Available at: http://www.frontiersin.org/humanneuroscience/paper/10.3389/neuro.09/012.2009/html/CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, F. (1994) The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. Scribner.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. (1997) The symbolic species: The coevolution of language and the brain. Norton.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1978) Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. MIT Press/A Bradford Book.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1981) Making sense of ourselves (Reply to S. Stich, “Dennett on Intentional Systems”). Philosophical Topics 12:6381. Reprinted in: Mind, brain, and function: Essays in the philosophy of mind, ed. J. I. Biro & R. W. Shahan, pp. 63–81. University of Oklahoma Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1984a) A route to intelligence: Oversimplify and self-monitor. Available at: http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/oversimplify.pdf.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1984b) Elbow room. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1985) Why believe in belief? (Review of S. Stich, From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief). Contemporary Psychology 30:949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. (1991) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1995a) Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schuster/Penguin.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2003a) Freedom evolves. Viking Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2003b) The Baldwin Effect: A crane, not a skyhook. In: Evolution and learning: The Baldwin Effect reconsidered, ed. Weber, B. H. & Depew, D. J., pp. 6079. MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2006a) Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. Viking/Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2009) Darwin's “strange inversion of reasoning.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106 (Suppl. 1):10061–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (forthcoming) Science and religion: Are they compatible? A debate with Alvin Plantinga. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. & McKay, R. T. (2006) A continuum of mindfulness (Commentary on Mesoudi et al.). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29(4):353–54.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A., Preston, J., Wegner, D. M. & Aarts, H. (2008) Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44:29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J. M. (1994) The metaphysics of free will. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M. & Ravizza, M. (1998) Responsibility and control: An essay on moral responsibility. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1988) The importance of what we care about. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, T. S. (2008) Alief and belief. Journal of Philosophy 105(10):634–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, W. & Norenzayan, A. (2009) Priming God increases public self-awareness. Unpublished raw data, University of British Columbia. [Author's note: The data are available upon request from Ara Norenzayan at: ]Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality Psychological Review 103(4):650–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & the, ABCResearch, Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108:814–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartung, J. (1988) Deceiving down: Conjectures on the management of subordinate status. In: Self-deception: An adaptive mechanism?, ed. Lockard, J. S. & Paulhus, D. L., pp. 170–85. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G. & Buss, D. M. (2000) Error Management Theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(1):8191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haselton, M. G. & Nettle, D. (2006) The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10(1):4766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Hoshino-Browne, E. & Correll, J. (2003) Secure and defensive high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(5):969–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinderman, P. & Bentall, R. P. (1996) Self-discrepancies and persecutory delusions: Evidence for a model of paranoid ideation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 105(1):106–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinderman, P. & Bentall, R. P. (1997) Causal attributions in paranoia and depression: Internal, personal, and situational attributions for negative events. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106(2):341–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeser, J. & O'Donohue, W. (1999) What is a delusion? Epistemological dimensions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108:687–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LoBue, V. & DeLoache, J. S. (2008) Detecting the snake in the grass: Attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children. Psychological Science 19(3):284–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKay, R. & Efferson, C. (under review) The subtleties of error management.Google Scholar
McKay, R., Langdon, R. & Coltheart, M. (2007b) The defensive function of persecutory delusions: An investigation using the Implicit Association Test. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 12(1):124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mele, A. R. (1995) Autonomous agents. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mineka, S., Davidson, M., Cook, M. & Keir, R. (1984) Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 93:355–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moritz, S., Werner, R. & von Collani, G. (2006) The inferiority complex in paranoia readdressed: A study with the Implicit Association Test. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 11(4):402–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pichon, I., Boccato, G. & Saroglou, V. (2007) Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology 37:1032–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph-Seng, B. & Nielsen, M. E. (2007) Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 17(4):303–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, A. F. & Norenzayan, A. (2007) God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science 18(9):803809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, M. (1990) On defining delusions. Comprehensive Psychiatry 31(5):377–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stich, S. (1990) The fragmentation of reason. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D. & Schooler, J. (2008) The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science 19(1):4954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. (1992) The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 47:373–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. (1999a) Evolutionary versus prototype analyses of the concept of disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108(3):374–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. (1999b) Mental disorder as a black box essentialist concept. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108(3):465–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (2002) The illusion of conscious will. Bradford Books/MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (2002) Darwin's cathedral: Evolution, religion and the nature of society. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamazaki, K. (2008) Colors of young and old spring leaves as a potential signal for ant-tended hemipterans. Plant Signaling and Behavior 3(11):984–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar