Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:40:27.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The objectivity of moral norms is a top-down cultural construct

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2018

Burton Voorhees
Affiliation:
Center for Science, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, T9S 3A3, Canada. [email protected]://science.athabascau.ca/staff-pages/burtv
Dwight Read
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. [email protected]://www.anthro.ucla,edu/faculty/dwight-read
Liane Gabora
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, V1V 1V7, Canada. [email protected]://people.ok.ubc.ca/lgabora

Abstract

Encultured individuals see the behavioral rules of cultural systems of moral norms as objective. In addition to prescriptive regulation of behavior, moral norms provide templates, scripts, and scenarios regulating the expression of feelings and triggered emotions arising from perceptions of norm violation. These allow regulated defensive responses that may arise as moral idea systems co-opt emotionally associated biological survival instincts.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Tal, D. (2000) Shared beliefs in a society. Sage.Google Scholar
Bergendorff, S. (2016) Kinship and human evolution: Making culture, becoming human. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2012) Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
De Leersnyder, J., Boiger, M. & Mesquita, B. (2013) Cultural regulation of emotion: Individual, relational, and structural sources. Frontiers in Psychology 4, Article 55:111. (Online article).Google Scholar
Dubreuil, B. (2010) Punitive emotions and norm violations. Philosophical Explorations 13(1):3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N. (2012) The group self. Science 336:848–52.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. (2002) Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology 53:161–86.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. (1969) Kinship and the social order: The legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. Aldine.Google Scholar
Hardin, C. D. & Higgins, E. T. (1996) Shared reality: How social verification manes the subjective objective. In: Handbook of motivation and cognition, vol. 3, ed. Sorrentino, R. M. & Higgins, E. T., pp. 2884. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kim, H. S. & Sasaki, J. Y. (2012) Emotional regulation: The interplay of culture and genes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6(12):865–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. R. M, Maxfield, D., Read, D. & van der Leeuw, S. (2009) From population to organization thinking. In: Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change, ed. Lane, D., Pumain, D., van der Leeuw, S. E. & West, G., pp. 1142. Springer.Google Scholar
Leaf, M. & Read, D. (2012) Human thought and social organization: Anthropology on a new plane. Lexington Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (2012) Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron 73(4):653–76.Google Scholar
Read, D. (2012) How culture makes us human. Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Read, D., Lane, D. & van der Leeuw, S. (2009) The innovation innovation. In: Complexity perspectives in innovation and social change, ed. Lane, D., Pumain, D., van der Leeuw, S. E. & West, G., pp. 4384. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spradley, J. P. & Mann, B. J. (1975) The cocktail waitress: The woman's work in a man's world. Wiley.Google Scholar
Voorhees, B., Read, D. & Gabora, L. (2018) Identity, kinship, and the evolution or cooperation. (Preprint, research project paper). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Identity-Kinship-and-Evolution-of-CooperationGoogle Scholar