Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:20:01.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Not so rational: A more natural way to understand the ANS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2021

Eli Hecht ,
Tracey Mills ,
Steven Shin  and
Jonathan Phillips Open the ORCID record for Jonathan Phillips [Opens in a new window]
Eli Hecht
Affiliation:
Program in Cognitive Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH03755, USA. [email protected]@[email protected]@dartmouth.eduhttp://phillab.host.dartmouth.edu/
Tracey Mills
Affiliation:
Program in Cognitive Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH03755, USA. [email protected]@[email protected]@dartmouth.eduhttp://phillab.host.dartmouth.edu/
Steven Shin
Affiliation:
Program in Cognitive Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH03755, USA. [email protected]@[email protected]@dartmouth.eduhttp://phillab.host.dartmouth.edu/
Jonathan Phillips
Affiliation:
Program in Cognitive Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH03755, USA. [email protected]@[email protected]@dartmouth.eduhttp://phillab.host.dartmouth.edu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In contrast to Clarke and Beck's claim that that the approximate number system (ANS) represents rational numbers, we argue for a more modest alternative: The ANS represents natural numbers, and there are separate, non-numeric processes that can be used to represent ratios across a wide range of domains, including natural numbers.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e190
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)