Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:17:52.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonaddictive instrumental drug use: Theoretical strengths and weaknesses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Andrew J. Goudie ,
Matthew J. Gullo ,
Abigail K. Rose ,
Paul Christiansen ,
Jonathan C. Cole ,
Matt Field  and
Harry Sumnall
Andrew J. Goudie
Affiliation:
Experimental Psychology, Liverpool University, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@liverpool.ac.ukhttp://www.liv.ac.uk/psychology/staff/agoudie.html
Matthew J. Gullo
Affiliation:
Experimental Psychology, Liverpool University, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@liverpool.ac.ukhttp://www.liv.ac.uk/psychology/staff/agoudie.html
Abigail K. Rose
Affiliation:
Experimental Psychology, Liverpool University, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@liverpool.ac.ukhttp://www.liv.ac.uk/psychology/staff/agoudie.html
Paul Christiansen
Affiliation:
Experimental Psychology, Liverpool University, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@liverpool.ac.ukhttp://www.liv.ac.uk/psychology/staff/agoudie.html
Jonathan C. Cole
Affiliation:
Experimental Psychology, Liverpool University, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@liverpool.ac.ukhttp://www.liv.ac.uk/psychology/staff/agoudie.html
Matt Field
Affiliation:
Experimental Psychology, Liverpool University, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@liverpool.ac.ukhttp://www.liv.ac.uk/psychology/staff/agoudie.html
Harry Sumnall
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Applied Social Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 2AY, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The potential to instrumentalize drug use based upon the detection of very many different drug states undoubtedly exists, and such states may play a role in psychiatric and many other drug uses. Nevertheless, nonaddictive drug use is potentially more parsimoniously explained in terms of sensation seeking/impulsivity and drug expectations. Cultural factors also play a major role in nonaddictive drug use.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 314 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anglin, M. D., Burke, C., Perrochet, B., Stamper, E. & Dawud-Noursi, S. (2002) History of the methamphetamine problem. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 32:137–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anokhin, A. P., Golosheykin, S., Grant, J. D. & Heath, A. C. (2011) Heritability of delay discounting in adolescence: A longitudinal twin study. Behavior Genetics 41:175–83. (DOI: 10.1007/s10519-010-9384-7).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cartier, J., Farabee, D. & Prendergast, M. L. (2006) Methamphetamine use, self-reported violent crime and recidivism among offenders in California who abuse substances. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 21:435–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colpaert, F. C. & Koek, W. (1996) Behavioural specificity of chlordiazepoxide-produced state dependent learning. Behavioural Pharmacology 7:49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. L. (2006) Does drinking promote risky sexual behaviour? A complex answer to a simple question. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15(1):19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullo, M. J. & Dawe, S. (2008) Impulsivity and adolescent substance use: Rashly dismissed as “all-bad”? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32:1507–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, B. T., Corbin, W. & Fromme, K. (2001) A review of expectancy theory and alcohol consumption. Addiction 96:57–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mizrahi, R., Bagby, M., Zipursky, R. B. & Kapur, S. (2005) How antipsychotics work: The patient's perspective. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 29:859–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrieff, J. & Cohen, D. (2009) How do psychiatric drugs work? British Medical Journal 338:1535–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moncrieff, J., Cohen, D. & Mason, J. P. (2009) The subjective experience of taking antipsychotic medication: A content analysis of internet data. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 120:1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morawska, A. & Oei, T. P. (2005) Binge drinking in university students: A test of the cognitive model. Addictive Behavior 30:203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesse, R. M. & Berridge, K. C. (1997) Psychoactive drug use in evolutionary perspective. Science 278:63–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NIDA Research Monograph 116 (1991) Drug discrimination: Applications to drug abuse research, ed. Glennon, R. A., Jarbe, T. U. C. & Frankenheim, J.. U.S. Department of Health and Human Sciences: NIDA 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville MD 29855, USA.Google Scholar
Rehm, J. & Gmel, G. (1999) Patterns of alcohol consumption and social consequences. Results from an 8-year follow-up study in Switzerland. Addiction 94:899–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarasoff, G. & Osti, K. (2007) Black-market value of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and hypnotics in Las Vegas, Nevada. American Journal of Psychiatry 164:350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2010) World Drug Report. http://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr/WDR_2010/Executive_summary.pdf. United Nations Publications.Google Scholar