Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:50:12.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moderators of sex differences in sexual selection theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Anthony D. Pellegrini
Anthony D. Pellegrini
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN 55405. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archer recognizes that sexual selection theory is sensitive to the effects of ecologies on sex differences, yet he does not explain the impact of such variation. For example, to what degree are there sex differences in aggression in polygynous and monogamous societies? I demonstrate how differences in mating perceptions affect the traditional dichotomy that males compete for and females choose mates.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 3-4 , August 2009 , pp. 285 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateson, P. P. G. & Martin, P. (1999) Design for a life: How behaviour develops. Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2004) Are men and women really so different? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buston, P. M. & Emlen, S. T. (2003) Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:8805–10.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1999) Staying alive: Evolution, culture and women's intra-sexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:203–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, T. M. & Bateson, P. (1986) Ontogeny and organization of alternative tactics. Animal Behaviour 34:1483–99.Google Scholar
Carranza, J. (2009) Defining sexual selection as sex-dependent selection. Animal Behaviour 77:749–51.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2009) Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour 77:3–11.Google Scholar
Crook, J. H. (1989) Introduction: Socioecological paradigms, evolution and history: Perspectives for the 1990s. In: Comparative socioecology: The behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals, ed. Standen, V. S. & Foley, R. A., pp. 1–36. Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871/1901) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray. Available online at:http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/charles_darwin/descent_of_man/chapter_08.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1997) Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist 52(12):1380–83.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. & Stevenson-Hinde, J., eds. (1973) Constraints on learning: Limitations and predispositions. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2005) Comes the child before man: How cooperative breeding and prolonged postweaning dependence shaped human potential. In: Hunter-gatherer childhoods: Evolutionary, developmental, and cultural perspectives, ed. Hewlett, B. S. & Lamb, M. E., pp. 65–91. Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. (1780) Account of an extraordinary pheasant. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 70:527–35.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (2005) The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist 60:581–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellegrini, A. D. (2004) Sexual segregation in childhood: A review of evidence for two hypotheses. Animal Behaviour 68:435–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D. & Long, J. D. (2003) A sexual selection theory longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 85:257–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellegrini, A. D., Long, J. D., Roseth, C., Bohn, K. & Van Ryzin, M. (2007a) A short-term longitudinal study of preschool children's sex segregation: The role of physical activity, sex, and time. Journal of Comparative Psychology 121:282–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellegrini, A. D., Roseth, C., Mliner, S. C., Bohn, Van Ryzin, M., Vance, N., Cheatham, C. L. & Tarullo, A. (2007b) Social dominance in preschool classrooms. Journal of Comparative Psychology 121:54–64.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D. & Smith, P. K. (1998) Physical activity play: The nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Development 69:577–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed