No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Learning and memory are inextricable
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 September 2024
Abstract
The authors' aim is to build “more biologically plausible learning algorithms” that work in naturalistic environments. Given that, first, human learning and memory are inextricable, and, second, that much human learning is unconscious, can the authors' first research question of how people improve their learning abilities over time be answered without addressing these two issues? I argue that it cannot.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Arzi, A., Shedlesky, L., Ben-Shaul, M., Nasser, K., Oksenberg, A., Hairston, I. S., & Sobel, N. (2012). Humans can learn new information during sleep. Nature neuroscience, 15(10), 1460–1465. doi: 10.1038/nn.3193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bezdek, J. C. (1992). On the relationship between neural networks, pattern recognition and intelligence. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 6(2), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. C., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Encoding and retrieval of information. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 93–107). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davachi, L., & Wagner, A. D. (2002). Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: Insights from relational and item-based learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88(2), 982–990. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.982CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foer, J. (2011). Moonwalking with Einstein: The art and science of remembering everything. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Fuster, J. M. (1999). Memory in the cerebral cortex: An empirical approach to neural networks in the human and nonhuman primate. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, S. (2013). Such stuff as dreams are made on? Elaborative encoding, the ancient art of memory, and the hippocampus. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(6), 589–607. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12003135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llewellyn, S., & Hobson, J. A. (2015). Not only… but also: REM sleep creates and NREM stage 2 instantiates landmark junctions in cortical memory networks. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 122, 69–87. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.04.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öhman, A., Carlsson, K., Lundqvist, D., & Ingvar, M. (2007). On the unconscious subcortical origin of human fear. Physiology & behavior, 92(1–2), 180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlus, J. (2016). Computers now recognize patterns better than humans can. Scientific American. Originally published as, “8. Sight-Reading Software” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 6 (December 2016), p. 41. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1216-39bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakral, P. P., Benoit, R. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2017). Characterizing the role of the hippocampus during episodic simulation and encoding. Hippocampus, 27(12), 1275–1284. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22796CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, R. (2018). Analyzing & preventing unconscious bias in machine learning. Retrieved from: QCon.ai 2018.Google Scholar
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente, L., & Matute, H. (2023). Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42384-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, Y., Kim, E., Sornborger, A., & Kenyon, G. T. (2020). Using sinusoidally-modulated noise as a surrogate for slow-wave sleep to accomplish stable unsupervised dictionary learning in a spike-based sparse coding model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 360–361).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Meta-learned models of cognition
Related commentaries (22)
Bayes beyond the predictive distribution
Challenges of meta-learning and rational analysis in large worlds
Combining meta-learned models with process models of cognition
Integrative learning in the lens of meta-learned models of cognition: Impacts on animal and human learning outcomes
Is human compositionality meta-learned?
Learning and memory are inextricable
Linking meta-learning to meta-structure
Meta-learned models as tools to test theories of cognitive development
Meta-learned models beyond and beneath the cognitive
Meta-learning and the evolution of cognition
Meta-learning as a bridge between neural networks and symbolic Bayesian models
Meta-learning goes hand-in-hand with metacognition
Meta-learning in active inference
Meta-learning modeling and the role of affective-homeostatic states in human cognition
Meta-learning: Bayesian or quantum?
Probabilistic programming versus meta-learning as models of cognition
Quantum Markov blankets for meta-learned classical inferential paradoxes with suboptimal free energy
Quo vadis, planning?
The added value of affective processes for models of human cognition and learning
The hard problem of meta-learning is what-to-learn
The meta-learning toolkit needs stronger constraints
The reinforcement metalearner as a biologically plausible meta-learning framework
Author response
Meta-learning: Data, architecture, and both