No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Lamarck, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and belief
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2010
Abstract
Nothing in McKay & Dennett's (M&D's) target article deals with the issue of how the adaptivity, or some other aspect, of beliefs might become a biological adaptation; which is to say, how the functions discussed might be coded in such a way in the brain that their development was also coded in gametes or sex transmission cells.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
References
Fodor, J. A. (1981) Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, P. J. (1978) The Naive Physics manifesto. In: Expert systems in the micro-electronic age, ed. Michie, D., pp. 242–70. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. J. P., Wadding, C. H., Longuet-Higgins, H. C. & Lucas, J. R. (1972) The nature of mind. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.-B. (1809/1914/1984) Philosophie zoologique, ou Exposition des considerations relatives a l'histoire naturelle des animaux… Paris. Published in English (trans. Hugh Eliot, ) Macmillan, London, 1914. Reprinted: University of Chicago Press, 1984. (Original work written in 1809).Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1936) The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sheldrake, R. (1987) Mind, memory, and archetype morphic resonance and the collective unconscious – Part I. Psychological Perspectives 18(1):9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar