Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:19:42.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is propositional learning necessary for human autonomic classical conditioning?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Michael E. Dawson  and
Anne M. Schell
Michael E. Dawson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University Southern California, Los Angeles, CA [email protected]://college.usc.edu/labs/dawson/home/index.cfm
Anne M. Schell
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA [email protected]://departments.oxy.edu/psych/index.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Additional support is presented for the necessity of awareness of the CS-US relation in human autonomic conditioning. However, possible limitations and exceptions regarding this general rule are discussed. Limitations include the lack of relationship between conditioned response (CR) strength and degree of awareness, and an important exception may be the finding of conditioning with backwardly masked CSs of a biologically prepared nature.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 205 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dawson, M. E. & Biferno, M. A. (1973) Concurrent measurement of awareness and electrodermal classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 101:55–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, M. E. & Furedy, J. J. (1976) The role of awareness in human differential autonomic classical conditioning: The necessary-gate hypothesis. Psychophysiology 13:50–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M. & Banis, H. T. (1986) Greater resistance to extinction of electrodermal responses conditioned to potentially phobic CS: A non-cognitive process? Psychophysiology 23:552–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., Beers, J. R. & Kelly, A. (1982) Allocation of cognitive processing capacity during human autonomic conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111:273–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, F., Parra, C., Dimberg, U. & Öhman, A. (1994) Non-conscious associative learning: Pavlovian conditioning of skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli. Psychophysiology 31:375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinkovic, K., Schell, A. M. & Dawson, M. E. (1989) Awareness of the CS-UCS contingency and classical conditioning of skin conductance responses with olfactory CSs. Biological Psychology 29:39–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, J. S., Buchel, C. & Dolan, R. J. (2001) Parallel neural responses in amygdala subregions and sensory cortex during implicit fear conditioning. Neuroimage 13:1044–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öhman, A. & Soares, J. J. F. (1998) Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli: Expectancies for aversive outcomes following non-recognized fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127:69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar