Article contents
Interpreting the neuroscience of imagery
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 March 2003
Abstract
Pylyshyn rightly argues that the neuroscientific data supporting the involvement of the visual system in mental imagery is largely irrelevant to the question of the format of imagistic representation. The purpose of this commentary is to support this claim with a further argument.
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2002 Cambridge University Press
- 2
- Cited by