Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:55:18.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation in sexual display

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2007

Joah R. Madden
Joah R. Madden
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/zoostaff/bbe/Madden/Joah1.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much attention has been paid to innovative foraging methods, but little to innovative sexual displays. Innovations may be common in behavioural display, such as song or object use, and could occur in both male display form and female preferences. Similar evidence exists for innovation in display as in foraging methods, but in smaller quantities. Ramsey et al.'s methodology permits rigorous data collection in this field.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 417 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C., Thompson, D. B., Sherman, G. L., Cunningham, M. A. & Tomback, D. F. (1982) Allozyme frequencies in a linear series of song dialect populations. Evolution 38:449–51.Google Scholar
Burley, N. T & Symanski, R. (1998) “A taste for the beautiful”: Latent aesthetic mate preferences for white crests in two species of Australian grassfinches. American Naturalist 152:792–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, C. A. & Whiten, A. (2003) Scrounging facilitates social learning in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Animal Behaviour 65:1085–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, D. O., Hebets, E. A. & Hoy, R. R. (2006) Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider. Behavioral Ecology 17:765–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. & Basolo, A. L. (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:415–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. B. & Frith, D. W. (2004) Bowerbirds. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gil, D., Cobb, J. L. S. & Slater, P. J. B. (2001) Song characteristics are age dependent in the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Animal Behaviour 62:689–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handford, P. (1981) Vegetational correlates of variation in the song of Zonotrichia capensis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 8:203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. L. (2006) Do American robins acquire songs by both imitating and inventing? Wilson Journal of Ornithology 118:341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. & Dugatkin, L. A. (1994) Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34:443–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroodsma, D. (2004) The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. In: Nature's music: The science of birdsong, ed. Marler, P. & Slabberkoorn, H., pp. 108–31. Elsevier/Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N. (1994) Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. Theoretical Population Biology 45:1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madden, J. R. & Balmford, A. P. (2004) Spotted bowerbirds Chlamydera maculata do not prefer rare or costly bower decorations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:589–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, J. R., Lowe, T. J., Fuller, H. V., Dasmahapatra, K. K. & Coe, R. L. (2004) Local traditions of bower decoration by spotted bowerbirds in a single population. Animal Behaviour 68:759–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marler, P. & Slabberkoorn, H. (2004) Nature's music: The science of birdsong. Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marler, P. & Tamura, M. (1964) Culturally transmitted patterns of vocal behaviour in sparrows. Science 146:1483–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. (2000) The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Rodd, F. H., Hughes, K. A., Grether, G. F. & Baril, C. T. (2002) A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: Are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 269:475–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slabbekoorn, H., Jesse, A. & Bell, D. A. (2003) Microgeographic song variation in island populations of the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys nutalli): Innovation through recombination. Behaviour 140:947–63.Google Scholar
Swaddle, J. P., Cathey, M. G., Correll, M. & Hodkinson, B. P. (2005) Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: A non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 272:1053–58.Google Scholar
ten, Cate, C. & Rowe, C. (2007) Biases in signal evolution: Learning makes a difference. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:380–87.Google Scholar
Uy, J. A. C. & Borgia, G. (2000) Sexual selection drives rapid divergence in bowerbird display traits. Evolution 54:273–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Uy, J. A. C., Patricelli, G. L. & Borgia, G. (2001) Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. American Naturalist 158:530–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellenga, R. (1986) Bower-building behaviour of immature satin bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Australian Bird Watcher 11:166–67.Google Scholar