Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:40:59.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In defense of intuitive mathematical theories as the basis for natural number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2008

David Barner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA [email protected]

Abstract

Though there are holes in the theory of how children move through stages of numerical competence, the current approach offers the most promising avenue for characterizing changes in competence as children confront new mathematical concepts. Like the science of mathematics, children's discovery of number is rooted in intuitions about sets, and not purely in analytic truths.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carey, S. (1985) Conceptual change in childhood. Bradford Books/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970) Logical investigations: Vol. 1. Prolegomena to pure logic, trans. Findlay Routledge, J. & Paul, Kegan.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781/1934) Critique of pure reason, trans. Meiklejohn, J. M. D.. Everyman (Original work published in 1781).Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1929/2007) The child's conception of the world. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar