Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:20:46.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How trivial is the “trivial neuron doctrine”?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Steven G. Daniel
Steven G. Daniel
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89577-0056 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that Gold & Stoljar's “trivial neuron doctrine” is not in fact trivial. Many familiar positions in the philosophy of mind run afoul of it, and it is unclear that even those whom Gold & Stoljar identify as adherents of the trivial neuron doctrine can be comfortably described as such.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , October 1999 , pp. 834 - 835
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)