Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:45:02.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to understand beliefs

Review products

Commentary onCopnikAlison (1993) How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. BBS 16:1–14.
Commentary onGoldmanAlvin I. (1993) The psychology of folk psychology. BBS 16:15–28.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Alison Gopnik
Alison Gopnik
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this response various possible objections to the critique of first-person-authority in Gopnik (1993), are considered. The heart of all three objections is that “beliefs” and other notions of commonsense psychology should not be construed as attempts to describe the functional character of our minds. Rather, they are 1) an evolutionarily determined technique for dealing with our conspecifics (Bogdan) or 2) the result of interpretation (Van Brakel) or 3) self-constitutive entities which exist only when we have the concept of their existence (Greve and Buchner). While the word belief might be construed in all these ways, they do not correspond either to the construals of our commonsense psychology or of a scientific psychology.

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 398 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogdan, R. (1993) The architectural nonchalance of commonsense psychology. Mind and Language 8: 189–205. [rAIG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, G. (1993) Towards an ecology of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 31–32. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. L. & Bickhard, M. H. (1993) Knowing levels and the child's understanding of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 33–34. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chater, N. (1993) Categorization theories and folk psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 37. [RJB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1984) First person authority, Dialectica 38: 101–11. [JvB, rAIG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. (1987) Psychosemantics. MIT Press. [rAIG, JP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. (1993a) The psychology of folk psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 15–28. [RJB, JvB, rAIG, JP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A.(1993b) Consciousness, folk psychology and cognitive science. Consciousness and Cognition 2: 364–82. [JP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. (1993c) Philosophical applications of cognitive science. Westview Press. [JP]Google Scholar
Goldman, A.(1993d) Competing accounts of belief-task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 43–44. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. (1993a) How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionaltty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 1–14. [RJB, JvB, rAG, WG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. (1993b) Theories and illusions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 90–100. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A.(1993c) Psychopsychology. Consciousness and Cognition 2: 264–80. [rAG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1994) Minds, bodies and persons: Young children's understanding of the self and others as reflected in imitation and “theory of mind” research. In: Self-awareness in animals and humans, ed. Parker, S. & Mitchell, R.. New York: Cambridge University Press. [rAG]Google Scholar
Gurd, J. M. & Marshall, J. C. (1993) Know my own mind? I should be so lucky! Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 47–48. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L. (1993) First-person current. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 48–49. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B. (1993) Common sense and adult theory of communication. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 54. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobes, B. W. (1993) Self-attributions help constitute mental types. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 54–56. [RJB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970) Criticism and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Criticism and the growth of knowledge, ed. Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A.. [WG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow, P. & Martin, N. (1993) The fallibility of first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 60. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Gopnik, A. (1993) The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing theories of mind. In: Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism, ed. Baron-Cohen, S. & Tager-Flusberg, H.. Oxford University Press. [rAG]Google Scholar
Moore, C. & Barresi, J. (1993) Knowledge of the psychological states of self and others is not only theory-laden but also data-driven. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 61–62. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, A. (1993) Heuristics and counterfactual self-knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 63–64. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. (1993) Developmental evidence and introspection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 64–65. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. & Astington, J. W. (1993) The role of concepts in perception and inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 65–66. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietroski, P. M. (1993) First-person authority and beliefs as representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 67–69. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillow, B. H. (1993) Limitations on first-person experience: Implications of the “extent.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 69. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D. C. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1993) Representational development and theory-of-mind computations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 70–71. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, G. (1993) Why presume analyses are on-line? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 74–75. [RJB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rips, L. J. (1993) Qualities and relations in folk theories of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 75–76. [RJB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, M. (1986) Davidson and social science. In: Truth and interpretation, ed. LePore, E.. , Blackwell. [JvB]Google Scholar
Saunders, B. A. C. (1993) Disenshrining the Cartesian self. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 77–78. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegal, M. (1993) Knowing children's minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 79–80. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. (1979) The structuralist view of theories. Berlin: Springer. [WG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. (1959) Individuals. London: Methuen. [JvB]Google Scholar
Suppe, F. (1974) The structure of scientific theories. University of Illinois Press. [WG]Google Scholar
Swift, J. (1726) Gulliver's travels. 1965 reprint. Blackwell. [JvB]Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1993) Where's the person? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 84–85. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Brakel, J. (1994) Emotions as the fabric of forms of life: A cross-cultural perspective. In: Social perspectives on emotion, vol 2, ed. Wentworth, W. M. & Ryan, J.. JAI Press. [JvB]Google Scholar
Van Brakel, J. & Geurts, J. P. M. (1988) Pragmatic identity ot meaning and metaphor. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2: 205–26. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1980) Remarks on the philosophy of psychology, vol. 2, ed. von Wright, G. H. & Nyman, H.. The University of Chicago Press. [JvB]Google Scholar
Zaitchik, D. & Samet, J. (1993) Intentionality, theoreticity and innateness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 87–88. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. D. & Frye, D. (1993) The psychologist's fallacy (and the philosopher's omission). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 8990. [JvB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar