Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:53:18.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to elicit sound probabilistic reasoning: Beyond word problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2007

Vittorio Girotto  and
Michel Gonzalez
Vittorio Girotto
Affiliation:
Department of Arts and Industrial Design, University IUAV of Venice, Convento delle Terese, 30123 Venice, [email protected]://www.iuav.it/English-Ve/Department/dADI-dep/Faculty-te/Vittorio-G/index.htm
Michel Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, University of Provence and CNRS, Centre St Charles, 13331 Marseilles, France. [email protected]://www.up.univ-mrs.fr/document.php?pagendx=3614&project=lpc
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Barbey & Sloman (B&S) conclude that natural frequency theorists have raised a fundamental question: What are the conditions that compel individuals to reason extensionally? We argue that word problems asking for a numerical judgment used by these theorists cannot answer this question. We present evidence that nonverbal tasks can elicit correct intuitions of posterior probability even in preschoolers.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2007 , pp. 268
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brainerd, C. J. (1981) Working memory and the developmental analysis of probability judgment. Psychological Review 88:463–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Hoffrage, U. (1995) How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 102:684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Hoffrage, U. (1999) Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999). Psychological Review 106:425–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girotto, V. & Gonzalez, M. (in press) Children's understanding of posterior probability. Cognition. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.005.Google Scholar