Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:31:48.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Higher-level processes in the formation and application of associations during action understanding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Lieke Heil ,
Stan van Pelt ,
Johan Kwisthout ,
Iris van Rooij  and
Harold Bekkering
Lieke Heil
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://www.ru.nl/donders/
Stan van Pelt
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://www.ru.nl/donders/
Johan Kwisthout
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://www.ru.nl/donders/
Iris van Rooij
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://www.ru.nl/donders/
Harold Bekkering
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://www.ru.nl/donders/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The associative account described in the target article provides a viable explanation for the origin of mirror neurons. We argue here that if mirror neurons develop purely by associative learning, then they cannot by themselves explain intentional action understanding. Higher-level processes seem to be involved in the formation of associations as well as in their application during action understanding.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 202 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brass, M., Schmitt, R. M., Spengler, S. & Gergely, G. (2007) Investigating action understanding: Inferential processes versus action simulation. Current Biology 17(24):2117–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, R. E. & Squire, L. R. (1998) Classical conditioning and brain systems: The role of awareness. Science 280(5360):77–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Lange, F. P., Spronk, M., Willems, R. M., Toni, I. & Bekkering, H. (2008) Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Current Biology 18(6):454–57.Google Scholar
Uithol, S., van Rooij, I., Bekkering, H. & Haselager, P. (2011) What do mirror neurons mirror? Philosophical Psychology 24(5):607–23.Google Scholar
Waldmann, M. R. (2000) Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(1):53–76.Google Scholar
Walters, E. T., Carew, T. J. & Kandel, E. R. (1979) Classical conditioning in Aplysia californica . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76(12):6675–79.Google Scholar